Bug#1011505: transition: gpgme1.0
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-gpgme1.0.html
On 2022-05-23 23:10:21 -0400, Daniel Kahn Gillmor wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> X-Debbugs-Cc: dkg@fifthhorseman.net, deltaone@debian.org
>
> The only packages that need to be rebuilt against this soname bump are
> part of KDE, specifically these binary packages:
>
> accountwizard
> kdepim-addons
> kget
> kleopatra
> kmail
> libkf5libkleo5
> libkf5mailcommon5abi2
> libkf5messagecomposer5abi1
> libkf5messagecore5abi1
> libkf5messageviewer5abi1
> libkf5mimetreeparser5abi1
>
> These come from the following sources:
>
> kdepim-addons
> kf5-messagelib
> kget
> kleopatra
> kmail
> kmail-account-wizard
> libkf5libkleo
> libkf5mailcommon
>
> Patrick Franz (in Cc) from the KDE team tested them and reported that
> they build cleanly with an NMU (see attached message).
>
> Release team, please ACK so i can proceed with the upload to unstable.
Please go ahead
Cheers
>
> Regards,
>
> --dkg
>
>
> Ben file:
>
> title = "gpgme1.0";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "libqgpgme7" | .depends ~ "libqgpgme15";
> is_good = .depends ~ "libqgpgme15";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "libqgpgme7";
> X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
> d=1e100.net; s=20210112;
> h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to
> :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding;
> bh=oeVrgfF5zWr7ctjic7dVLveRG26Sy0vaKyFu8vQ1Xpo=;
> b=g4a5KhJl1Z86Zo5WyqUkuDiZzLvD2ag98UswCzkP/nG8i0tFIglylY0HD1SVg7N+2y
> r+vYb3xuRohGxwSPPZTBWEERpIzMXVwg0qVHdwjvpHWLV21T2OmEwB1r3iLcYHURIOZX
> 0aIcaZwSFn7fXBhjYdXRllAi4UzBT87wgo5aTNbrgveYkmuETd2fWnlWt+rdXUnLZtWb
> yNFjOePrrp+2yAQl5vVLno5ljNwvoK3wkJNtPNqX3opWRJRvTKMod2tHXNa1lCVZ86rn
> LXGtxd7EWsVYfTPfJEHFac2ApJpF8PDR1qII9qxXVsKzMrUG0g1RmfCg+D4fCPWgSPlU
> VTuw==
> X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5316WPFtNxI4QQZw4IxqiNBw7n9VbWHLp6yREKH7KwRzmsmJgmWp
> gJPDL3BGOlXPpHuJIBOiJQc=
> X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJxtTiLSLkyyEU6xbiBlvNXUhN9FH1qGtHs3aTU30OPqODvCX44FW7qW+5V2/w40TEvQxue0Tw==
> X-Received: by 2002:a2e:a5ca:0:b0:253:c604:647c with SMTP id n10-20020a2ea5ca000000b00253c604647cmr11071204ljp.403.1653237143884;
> Sun, 22 May 2022 09:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
> Received: from delta-one.localnet (217-210-33-15-no2104.tbcn.telia.com. [217.210.33.15])
> by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id bi23-20020a05651c231700b00253dfbe2522sm1080181ljb.100.2022.05.22.09.32.22
> (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256);
> Sun, 22 May 2022 09:32:23 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Patrick Franz <deltaone@debian.org>
> To: debian-qt-kde@lists.debian.org, Daniel Kahn Gillmor <dkg@fifthhorseman.net>
> Subject: Re: rebuilding against libqgpgme-dev (soname bump from libqgpgme7 to libqgpgme15)
> Date: Sun, 22 May 2022 18:32:21 +0200
> Message-ID: <1831765.tdWV9SEqCh@delta-one>
> In-Reply-To: <87zgjbficl.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
> References: <87zgjbficl.fsf@fifthhorseman.net>
> MIME-Version: 1.0
> Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
> Received-SPF: pass (srs.pair.com ... _spfmailwash.pair.com: 209.68.5.116 is authorized to use 'SRS0=GHde=V6=gmail.com=deltaone.debian@srs.pair.com' in 'mfrom' identity (mechanism 'ip4:209.68.0.0/18' matched)) receiver=mailwash52.pair.com; identity=mailfrom; envelope-from="SRS0=GHde=V6=gmail.com=deltaone.debian@srs.pair.com"; helo=itihasa.pair.com; client-ip=209.68.5.116
> X-Virus-Check-By: mailwash52.pair.com
> X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.07 on 66.39.2.52
> Delivered-To: dkg@fifthhorseman.net
> X-Scanned-By: mailmunge 3.07 on 66.39.2.52
> Delivered-To: daniel_gillmor@fifthhorseman.net
> X-Envelope-To: daniel_gillmor@fifthhorseman.net
>
> Hi Daniel,
>
> Am Samstag, 21. Mai 2022, 09:35:54 CEST schrieb Daniel Kahn Gillmor:
> > I think the following 8 source packages will need a rebuild:
> >=20
> > kdepim-addons
> > kf5-messagelib
> > kget
> > kleopatra
> > kmail
> > kmail-account-wizard
> > libkf5libkleo
> > libkf5mailcommon
> >=20
> > Let me know what you think is a good plan here,
>
> I rebuilt those packages against gpgme 1.17 in experimental and all of=20
> them built successfully without the need of adjusting anything.
>
> So I'd suggest you simply request a transition and state that all these=20
> packages build against gpgme 1.17 and only need NMUs.
>
>
> =2D-=20
> Med v=C3=A4nliga h=C3=A4lsningar
>
> Patrick Franz
>
>
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: