Bug#1010438: marked as done (transition: nodejs)
Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2022 09:34:04 +0200
with message-id <Yn9bbPh52QkNb7sR@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1010438: transition: nodejs
has caused the Debian Bug report #1010438,
regarding transition: nodejs
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1010438: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1010438
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Hi,
nodejs 16.14.2 is the current active version of nodejs:
https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/
It also supports riscv64 architecture and has much better support of ppc64.
A rebuild of all (1600+) reverse-build-deps of libnode-dev/nodejs shows
very few regressions, alerady being dealt with.
Ben file:
title = "nodejs";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libnode83" | .depends ~ "libnode93";
is_good = .depends ~ "libnode93";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libnode83";
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2022-05-02 10:42:32 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-nodejs.html
>
> On 2022-05-01 17:17:13, Jérémy Lal wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Hi,
> >
> > nodejs 16.14.2 is the current active version of nodejs:
> > https://nodejs.org/en/about/releases/
> > It also supports riscv64 architecture and has much better support of ppc64.
> >
> > A rebuild of all (1600+) reverse-build-deps of libnode-dev/nodejs shows
> > very few regressions, alerady being dealt with.
>
> Since we need that to finish the icu transition, please go ahead.
libnodejs83 was removed from testing.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: