Bug#1009080: transition: libgit2
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: praveen@debian.org, mdbilal@disroot.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello Release Team,
We would like to request a transition for libgit2 1.3.0
(experimental -> unstable).
The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.I've raised failure bugs against these packages.
rebuild cargo ... FAIL (#1009015)
rebuild criterion ... FAIL (#1009017)
rebuild fritzing ... PASS
rebuild geany-plugins ... PASS
rebuild gitg ... PASS
rebuild gnuastro ... PASS
rebuild guile-git ... FAIL (#1009041)
rebuild horizon-eda ... PASS
rebuild julia ... FAIL (#1009029)
rebuild ktexteditor ... PASS
rebuild kup-backup ... PASS
rebuild libgit-raw-perl ... FAIL (#1009031)
rebuild libgit2-glib ... FAIL (#1009019)
rebuild python-pygit2 ... FAIL (#1009033)
rebuild r-cran-gert ... PASS
rebuild ruby-rugged ... PASS
rebuild rust-libgit2-sys ... FAIL (#1009034)
Ben file:
title = "libgit2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgit2-1.1" | .depends ~ "libgit2-1.3";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgit2-1.3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgit2-1.1";
Regards,
rmb
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=rAC8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: