[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1004841: marked as done (transition: libpdb-redo)

Your message dated Sat, 12 Feb 2022 13:24:00 +0100
with message-id <Ygem4FUnN9ykgqb6@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1004841: transition: libpdb-redo
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004841,
regarding transition: libpdb-redo
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004841: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004841
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Dear release team,

I would like to request a transition slot for libpdb-redo
(experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1]
is OK, all reverse dependencies build fine.
BTW, this will also fix bug #1004798. I should have requested for a transition of both libcifpp and libpdb-redo since they are interdependent. 

Best regards,
Maarten L. Hekkelman

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpdb-redo.html

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2022-02-02 08:57:15 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2022-02-02 08:39:21 +0100, Maarten L. Hekkelman wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Dear release team,
> > 
> > I would like to request a transition slot for libpdb-redo
> > (experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1]
> > is OK, all reverse dependencies build fine.
> > 
> > BTW, this will also fix bug #1004798. I should have requested for a
> > transition of both libcifpp and libpdb-redo since they are interdependent.
> 
> Please go ahead

The old binary packages got removed. Closing.

Cheers

> 
> Cheers
> 
> > 
> > Best regards,
> > Maarten L. Hekkelman
> > 
> > [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libpdb-redo.html
> > 
> 
> -- 
> Sebastian Ramacher



-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: