[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1024989: marked as done (transition: simbody)

Your message dated Sun, 18 Dec 2022 15:21:55 +0100
with message-id <Y58iA72is0V/eK2e@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1024989: transition: simbody
has caused the Debian Bug report #1024989,
regarding transition: simbody
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1024989: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024989
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

I would like to request a transition slot for simbody
(experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1]
is OK. All reverse dependencies currently are not in testing:

* gazebo FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0 [2], unrelated
* molmodel builds OK, but needs minor adjustment (I will upload)
Migration of simbody is blocked by FTBFS on ppc64el, mips64el [3]. I will ask to RM packages for these architectures for now. 

Thanks,
Andrius

[1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-simbody.html
[2] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004795
[3] https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1024526

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2022-11-28 20:43:14 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2022-11-28 13:42:56 +0200, Andrius Merkys wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Hello,
> > 
> > I would like to request a transition slot for simbody
> > (experimental -> unstable) due to soname bump. Current ben tracker [1]
> > is OK. All reverse dependencies currently are not in testing:
> > 
> > * gazebo FTBFS with ffmpeg 5.0 [2], unrelated
> > * molmodel builds OK, but needs minor adjustment (I will upload)
> > 
> > Migration of simbody is blocked by FTBFS on ppc64el, mips64el [3]. I will
> > ask to RM packages for these architectures for now.
> 
> simbody is not in testing, so you can go ahead with that anytime.

simbody migrated. Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

--- End Message ---
Reply to: