Bug#1023731: BioC Packages are now clean (one exception with RC bug filed) (Was: Bug#1023731: Any idea why debci picks old versions)
On 2022-12-03 23:10:21 +0100, Andreas Tille wrote:
> Am Sat, Dec 03, 2022 at 10:53:58PM +0100 schrieb Sebastian Ramacher:
> > And there are many more. r-bioc-biocparallel is another one. This smells
> > like many insufficient dependencies.
>
> Sorry, this all seems to be the same britney failure Paul was reporting.
> The tests are all against the versions in testing which makes no sense
> at all. These tests are not fixable since the old versions of BioC 3.15
> are bound to fail with packages from 3.16.
No, it's not. If you check the logs from r-bioc-htsfilter for example
(https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/amd64/r/r-bioc-htsfilter/28944996/log.gz),
you see that some packages have actual regressions:
Removing autopkgtest-satdep (0) ...
autopkgtest [19:15:37]: test run-unit-test: [-----------------------
cp: cannot stat '/usr/share/doc/r-bioc-htsfilter/tests/*': No such file or directory
autopkgtest [19:15:37]: test run-unit-test: -----------------------]
autopkgtest [19:15:37]: test run-unit-test: - - - - - - - - - - results - - - - - - - - - -
run-unit-test FAIL non-zero exit status 1
autopkgtest [19:15:37]: test pkg-r-autopkgtest: preparing testbed
> If this might help and is easily to realise removing all r-bioc-*
> packages from testing could enable the migration of the packages in
> unstable.
I've done that now.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: