Quoting Simon McVittie (2022-10-24 13:24:07) > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: transition > X-Debbugs-Cc: dr@jones.dk > Forwarded: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ghostscript.html > Affects: src:ghostscript src:gimp src:dvisvgm src:libspectre src:xfig > > ghostscript appears to have started an unscheduled transition from libgs9 > and libgs9-common to libgs10 and libgs-common. libgs-common Breaks and > Replaces libgs9-common, so the affected packages will all have to migrate > together. > > Looking at ghostscript's changelog, it seems this might have been > accidental? There's no mention of the experimental version having been > intentionally re-uploaded to unstable. > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-ghostscript.html looks > like it is tracking the affected packages, so I haven't tried to write a > ben file for this. > > Please coordinate with the release team to either finish or revert > this transition. Sorry, I forgot to warn the release team ahead. Ghostscript upstream has bumped its SONAME. There should be no breakage (other than the kind of breakage already done in "9" releases, due to security tightening of the internal Postscript interpreter), but yes it requires a rebuild for those package directly linking with libgs. I am frankly clueless about ben files and other transition magic, and would appreciate if someone more skilled in the art can guide this process. - Jonas -- * Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt * Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/ [x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: signature