Bug#1020564: marked as done (transition: coq-simple-io)
Your message dated Sat, 1 Oct 2022 18:40:48 +0200
with message-id <YzhtkOD9BqlKK+Kj@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1020564: transition: coq-simple-io
has caused the Debian Bug report #1020564,
regarding transition: coq-simple-io
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1020564: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1020564
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: jpuydt@debian.org
X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers
<debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
Hi,
there is a new version of coq-simple-io ; it requires re-building
another package:
nmu coq-quickchick_1.6.4-2+b1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild because of upload of
coq-simple-io=1.8.0-1'
dw coq-quickchick_1.6.4-2+b1 . ANY . -m 'coq-simple-io >= 1.8.0-1'
I'm waiting for your approval to upload coq-simple-io 1.8.0-1.
Cheers,
J.Puydt
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: julien.puydt@gmail.com, 1020564-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1020564: transition: coq-simple-io
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 1 Oct 2022 18:40:48 +0200
- Message-id: <YzhtkOD9BqlKK+Kj@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <YzcPJgl3U7wvS1fb@ramacher.at>
- References: <0b78062e0e99bd9d28fc9150deb3c1f97496b735.camel@gmail.com> <YzBcawWyx1KZthJ2@ramacher.at> <0b78062e0e99bd9d28fc9150deb3c1f97496b735.camel@gmail.com> <7bf0601c3f1e9a60cc8c5a316e8131a418fcdc36.camel@gmail.com> <0b78062e0e99bd9d28fc9150deb3c1f97496b735.camel@gmail.com> <YzcPJgl3U7wvS1fb@ramacher.at>
On 2022-09-30 17:45:42 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2022-09-29 14:04:20 +0200, julien.puydt@gmail.com wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le dimanche 25 septembre 2022 à 15:49 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher a
> > écrit :
> > > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > >
> > > On 2022-09-23 14:36:02 +0200, julien.puydt@gmail.com wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: jpuydt@debian.org
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: Debian OCaml Maintainers
> > > > <debian-ocaml-maint@lists.debian.org>
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > there is a new version of coq-simple-io ; it requires re-building
> > > > another package:
> > > >
> > > > nmu coq-quickchick_1.6.4-2+b1 . ANY . -m 'Rebuild because of
> > > > upload of
> > > > coq-simple-io=1.8.0-1'
> > > > dw coq-quickchick_1.6.4-2+b1 . ANY . -m 'coq-simple-io >= 1.8.0-1'
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > I'm waiting for your approval to upload coq-simple-io 1.8.0-1.
> > >
> > > Please go ahead
> >
> > I uploaded coq-simple-io 1.8.0-1 a few days ago already, but it looks
> > like coq-quickchick didn't get rebuilt as I was expecting -- so it's
> > uninstallable and prevents testing migration.
> >
> > What went wrong and what can I do to help ?
>
> I have scheduled the binNMUs yesterday.
coq-simple-io and the binNMUs migrated.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: