Bug#1016084: transition: petsc
On 2022-09-19 13:28:21 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> On 2022-09-19 12:47, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2022-09-19 11:54:36 +0200, Drew Parsons wrote:
> > > This transition can be considered done, if we're happy with the
> > > state of
> > > rheolef reported by
> > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mumps.html
> > > https://buildd.debian.org/status/package.php?p=rheolef
> >
> > It's only done when the old mumps libraries are removed from testing.
> > That's currently blocked by getfem and rheolef:
> ...
> > The both need to be fixed or removed from testing.
>
> I see it, thanks for the clarification.
What's the plan regarding getfem++/getfem? It looks like some package
renaming was started in unstable but it was never finished.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
Reply to: