[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#998390: marked as done (buster-pu: package ruby-activeldap/5.2.2-2+deb10u1)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:40:55 +0100
with message-id <2cfc9645343bdb910fe19c07bddfec2c428346a3.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates included in 10.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #998390,
regarding buster-pu: package ruby-activeldap/5.2.2-2+deb10u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998390: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998390
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

There is an open bug report about ruby-activeldap missing a dependency on
ruby-builder. This issue is only present in Buster and the fix is quite easy.
Please consider this minor update.

https://bugs.debian.org/982522

[ Impact ]
The user has to manually install ruby-builder to be able to use
ruby-activeldap or hope another package will pull it in.

[ Tests ]
This update adds only a dependency. It doesn't change the behavior. The package
did not have the tests enabled at this point (was done in 5.2.4-1). I could
enable the tests, but it will make the diff significantly larger because it
requires applying more of the package changes done in version 5.2.4-1. I
actually don't see any benefit here.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] *all* changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [x] attach debdiff against the package in (old)stable
  [x] the issue is verified as fixed in unstable

[ Changes ]
The only change is that ruby-builder was added to the dependency list.

Regards, Daniel

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=JmsM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

diff --git a/debian/changelog b/debian/changelog
index 6c9ba2a..20756aa 100644
--- a/debian/changelog
+++ b/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+ruby-activeldap (5.2.2-2+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+  * Add missing dependency on ruby-builder (closes: #982522).
+
+ -- Daniel Leidert <dleidert@debian.org>  Wed, 03 Nov 2021 15:10:29 +0100
+
 ruby-activeldap (5.2.2-2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Removed dependency on ruby-gettext-i18n-rails, not needed since
diff --git a/debian/control b/debian/control
index e92b671..b2452b9 100644
--- a/debian/control
+++ b/debian/control
@@ -22,6 +22,7 @@ XB-Ruby-Versions: ${ruby:Versions}
 Depends: ruby | ruby-interpreter,
          ruby-activemodel,
          ruby-activesupport,
+         ruby-builder,
          ruby-gettext,
          ruby-locale,
          ruby-net-ldap (>= 0.9.13),

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Version: 10.13

Hi,

Each of the updates referenced in these bugs was included in today's
10.13 point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: