[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1018184: marked as done (buster-pu: package python-udatetime/0.0.16-1+deb10u1)

Your message dated Sat, 10 Sep 2022 13:40:55 +0100
with message-id <2cfc9645343bdb910fe19c07bddfec2c428346a3.camel@adam-barratt.org.uk>
and subject line Closing requests for updates included in 10.13
has caused the Debian Bug report #1018184,
regarding buster-pu: package python-udatetime/0.0.16-1+deb10u1
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1018184: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1018184
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
Tags: buster
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: pu
X-Debbugs-Cc: Ilias Tsitsimpis <iliastsi@debian.org>

  * Backport upstream patch to fix failing test (Closes: #953539)
  * Patch udatetime to properly link against libm library.
    Thanks to Aurelien Jarno for the patch (Closes: #954305)

The first change is a FTBFS fix.

The second change is correct, it might or might not make a difference
when upgrading to bullseye.

python-udatetime was not previously rebuilt to drop the C extension
for Python 3.6 (not in buster), only the Python 3.7 extension is built now.

diff -Nru python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/changelog python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/changelog
--- python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/changelog	2018-02-15 21:10:47.000000000 +0200
+++ python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/changelog	2022-08-26 20:11:06.000000000 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,12 @@
+python-udatetime (0.0.16-1+deb10u1) buster; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Backport upstream patch to fix failing test (Closes: #953539)
+  * Patch udatetime to properly link against libm library.
+    Thanks to Aurelien Jarno for the patch (Closes: #954305)
+
+ -- Adrian Bunk <bunk@debian.org>  Fri, 26 Aug 2022 20:11:06 +0300
+
 python-udatetime (0.0.16-1) unstable; urgency=low
 
   [ Ondřej Nový ]
diff -Nru python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/fix-test.patch python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/fix-test.patch
--- python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/fix-test.patch	1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/fix-test.patch	2020-10-17 07:31:51.000000000 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
+From: Simon Pirschel <simon@aboutsimon.com>
+Date: Wed, 14 Mar 2018 11:42:36 +0100
+Subject: test with calculated offset based on diff between utc and local time
+
+---
+ test/test_udatetime.py | 4 +++-
+ 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
+
+diff --git a/test/test_udatetime.py b/test/test_udatetime.py
+index e9a00b7..3fbde87 100644
+--- a/test/test_udatetime.py
++++ b/test/test_udatetime.py
+@@ -75,7 +75,9 @@ class Test(unittest.TestCase):
+             self.assertEqual(udt.second, dt.second)
+             self.assertEqual(udt.microsecond, dt.microsecond)
+ 
+-            self.assertEqual(udt.utcoffset(), timedelta(0))
++            offset = datetime.fromtimestamp(t) - datetime.utcfromtimestamp(t)
++
++            self.assertEqual(udt.utcoffset(), offset)
+             self.assertEqual(udt.dst(), NO_DST)
+ 
+         for t in range(0, DAY, HOUR):
diff -Nru python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/Link-against-libm.patch python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/Link-against-libm.patch
--- python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/Link-against-libm.patch	1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/Link-against-libm.patch	2020-10-17 07:31:51.000000000 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,22 @@
+From: Ilias Tsitsimpis <iliastsi@debian.org>
+Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 20:29:16 +0300
+Subject: Link against libm
+
+Bug: https://github.com/freach/udatetime/issues/30
+Bug-Debian: https://bugs.debian.org/954305
+---
+ setup.py | 1 +
+ 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
+
+diff --git a/setup.py b/setup.py
+index 2770298..498f40c 100644
+--- a/setup.py
++++ b/setup.py
+@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@ if __pypy__ is None:
+         Extension(
+             'udatetime.rfc3339',
+             ['./src/rfc3339.c'],
++            libraries=['m'],
+             define_macros=macros,
+             extra_compile_args=['-Ofast', '-std=c99']
+         )
diff -Nru python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/series python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/series
--- python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/series	1970-01-01 02:00:00.000000000 +0200
+++ python-udatetime-0.0.16/debian/patches/series	2022-08-26 20:10:30.000000000 +0300
@@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
+fix-test.patch
+Link-against-libm.patch

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Version: 10.13

Hi,

Each of the updates referenced in these bugs was included in today's
10.13 point release.

Regards,

Adam

--- End Message ---
Reply to: