El 07/09/22 a las 21:13, Paul Gevers escribió: > Hi all, > > For transparency I'm letting you know that, with my Release Team manager hat > on, I have just added a migration block on grep. > > On Wed, 7 Sep 2022 17:39:45 +0200 Santiago Ruano =?iso-8859-1?Q?Rinc=F3n?= > <santiagorr@riseup.net> wrote: > > For the moment, I am waiting for (a final) upstream input about those > > warning, in this bug: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=57604 > > > > But giving: > > https://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=49996 > > I doubt they are willing to reconsider deprecating egrep and fgrep. > > But we should be considering our own users. Yes. I just wanted to have more info from upstream. Or avoid uploading two releases if they decided to revert that change. > I'd appreciate it if either > Debian continues to ship egrep and fgrep. Or if you don't want to do that or > if you don't want to decide on your own I'd appreciate it if we had a bit of > discussion in a broader audience (I suggest debian-devel@l.do) to see what > we as a project believe is the right course of action. I don't think it is needed to discuss at a debian-devel level. I am reconsidering to revert the related changes. I hope I will be able to upload tomorrow. > > To be clear, I'm not saying we can't have this change at all, but I'm saying > we can't have this change with at least some agreement that it's acceptable > by the project. The block is to buy us time to reach that agreement. > Thanks! > Paul
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature