Hi all, On 01-09-2022 14:18, Paul Gevers wrote:
Of course there are details to figure out and agree on, but before diving into those I'd like to hear if you are open to support the idea (hopefully even in time for bookworm) or if there are already deep concerns (that would take long to resolve if at all).
Although I wasn't expecting a big wave of enthousiasme from this audience, I was expecting at least some reply with concerns. Given that there hasn't been any reply, I don't know how you feel about this.
To be able to proceed before the bookworm freeze, I'm going to assume that in general this split (that shouldn't really impact DSA and ftp-master work [1]) is acceptable by you if there's no reply in two weeks. I'll work out more details after that.
Paul[1] I predict it may even reduce the amount of architecture specific removal requests in unstable, where the porters have a chance to fix broken packages.
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature