Bug#1001865: marked as done (transition: draco)
Your message dated Sat, 14 May 2022 13:03:34 +0200
with message-id <Yn+MhjUc7jcsblQh@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1001865: transition: draco
has caused the Debian Bug report #1001865,
regarding transition: draco
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
1001865: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1001865
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: draco
- From: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 23:53:07 +0100
- Message-id: <163978158721.237696.16609733480483157990.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Dear Release Team,
I would like to transition draco 1.5.0, which has a proper upstream SONAME
again. I verified that the reverse dependencies, pdal and assimp, build
successfully on amd64.
The autogenerated Ben tracker looks good:
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html
Cheers
Timo
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----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=sxgs
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>, 1001865-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1001865: transition: draco
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 14 May 2022 13:03:34 +0200
- Message-id: <Yn+MhjUc7jcsblQh@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <Yb0eyGXfAM+JNqDX@ramacher.at>
- References: <163978158721.237696.16609733480483157990.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <163978158721.237696.16609733480483157990.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <Yb0eyGXfAM+JNqDX@ramacher.at>
On 2021-12-18 00:35:36 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html
>
> On 2021-12-17 23:53:07 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> >
> > Dear Release Team,
> >
> > I would like to transition draco 1.5.0, which has a proper upstream SONAME
> > again. I verified that the reverse dependencies, pdal and assimp, build
> > successfully on amd64.
>
> Please go ahead
That's done.
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: