[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1009080: transition: libgit2





On 4/22/22 22:48, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html

On 2022-04-07 06:28:07 +0530, Mohammed Bilal wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: praveen@debian.org, mdbilal@disroot.org

Hello Release Team,

We would like to request a transition for libgit2 1.3.0
(experimental -> unstable).

The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.I've raised failure bugs against these packages.

rebuild cargo ... FAIL (#1009015)
rebuild criterion ... FAIL (#1009017)
rebuild fritzing ... PASS
rebuild geany-plugins ... PASS
rebuild gitg ... PASS
rebuild gnuastro ... PASS
rebuild guile-git ... FAIL (#1009041)
rebuild horizon-eda ... PASS
rebuild julia ... FAIL (#1009029)
rebuild ktexteditor ... PASS
rebuild kup-backup ... PASS
rebuild libgit-raw-perl ... FAIL (#1009031)
rebuild libgit2-glib ... FAIL (#1009019)
rebuild python-pygit2 ... FAIL (#1009033)
rebuild r-cran-gert ... PASS
rebuild ruby-rugged ... PASS
rebuild rust-libgit2-sys ... FAIL (#1009034)

the tracker at
https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libgit2.html also lists
packages such as git-evtag and gnome-builder. Are they able to build
with the new libgit2 version?

Cheers


I tried rebuilding both packages with libgit2 1.3.0 and both were built without any failures


Ben file:

title = "libgit2";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libgit2-1.1" | .depends ~ "libgit2-1.3";
is_good = .depends ~ "libgit2-1.3";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgit2-1.1";


Regards,
rmb




Regards,
rmb

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: