[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1004144: marked as done (transition: mbedtls)

Your message dated Fri, 11 Mar 2022 22:18:08 +0100
with message-id <Yiu8kLkl0edb204G@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1004144: transition: mbedtls
has caused the Debian Bug report #1004144,
regarding transition: mbedtls
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1004144: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1004144
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256

Hi, I'm trying to transition the MbedTLS library to the latest supported LTS
version, bumping the version from 2.16 to 2.28. All the libraries received a
SONAME bump, and only some really minor API incompatibilities were introduced.
I tested all the reverse dependencies of the library and all the ones that
built fine before still build fine now. Some of them fail to build, but they
also failed before upgrading MbedTLS; here's the list of currently failing
packages:

bctoolbox, #983985
charybdis, #978782
dolphin-emu, #976530
haxe, unsatisfiable build dependencies
srslte, #993701
julia, segmentation fault during tests (happens also when not using MbedTLS
2.28, maybe it's an issue of my computer)

My sponsor, Wookey, is going to take a look at the failing packages to see if
MbedTLS 2.28 introduces additional build issues for the already failing
packages (e.g. building bctoolbox with gcc-10).

This is the first time I do something like this, I hope I have not messed up
anything :)

Ben file:

title = "mbedtls";
is_affected = .depends ~ "libmbedcrypto3" | .depends ~ "libmbedtls12" |
.depends ~ "libmbedx509-0" | .depends ~ "libmbedcrypto7" | .depends ~
"libmbedtls14" | .depends ~ "libmbedx509-1";
is_good = .depends ~ "libmbedcrypto7" | .depends ~ "libmbedtls14" | .depends ~
"libmbedx509-1";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libmbedcrypto3" | .depends ~ "libmbedtls12" | .depends ~
"libmbedx509-0";


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iIoEARYIADIWIQSlw/BqXszDGx3GlQz/yQfijUdG7QUCYeroyxQcYW5kcmVhQHBh
cHBhY29kYS5pdAAKCRD/yQfijUdG7SnlAQDgR6neeL+EPxebJYR1iNYrMwIy4HFD
Xl5FSqY7tWUAFgEAtsZ6h0RE7eRbRrI3LvMSAeBhx+a6hX8jYa4Dcd/AdgY=
=Syq2
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2022-01-23 12:53:02 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-mbedtls.html
> Control: tags -1 confirmed
> 
> On 2022-01-21 18:09:32 +0100, Andrea Pappacoda wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > Hi, I'm trying to transition the MbedTLS library to the latest supported LTS
> > version, bumping the version from 2.16 to 2.28. All the libraries received a
> > SONAME bump, and only some really minor API incompatibilities were introduced.
> > I tested all the reverse dependencies of the library and all the ones that
> > built fine before still build fine now. Some of them fail to build, but they
> > also failed before upgrading MbedTLS; here's the list of currently failing
> > packages:
> > 
> > bctoolbox, #983985
> > charybdis, #978782
> > dolphin-emu, #976530
> > haxe, unsatisfiable build dependencies
> > srslte, #993701
> > julia, segmentation fault during tests (happens also when not using MbedTLS
> > 2.28, maybe it's an issue of my computer)
> > 
> > My sponsor, Wookey, is going to take a look at the failing packages to see if
> > MbedTLS 2.28 introduces additional build issues for the already failing
> > packages (e.g. building bctoolbox with gcc-10).
> > 
> > This is the first time I do something like this, I hope I have not messed up
> > anything :)
> 
> Please go ahead

The old binaries got removed, so that's done.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: