Your message dated Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:35:39 +0100 with message-id <YiFCuxgOEPdnnJHP@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1006000: transition: draco has caused the Debian Bug report #1006000, regarding transition: draco to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1006000: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1006000 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: draco
- From: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 18 Feb 2022 20:06:20 +0100
- Message-id: <164521118074.225089.15535057325773531974.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA512 Dear release team, I would like to transition draco for its new SONAME. The Ben tracker at https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html looks fine. I rebuilt all reverse dependencies on amd64 successfully. Cheers Timo -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQGzBAEBCgAdFiEEJvtDgpxjkjCIVtam+C8H+466LVkFAmIP7igACgkQ+C8H+466 LVmh9gwAwzoncl2MZpdYBiMAmFo2PyIUWLEDaDaVw92lmSr4+j7tm2ziycneToWF aby8OMO2uaYuN1F2U6w1pasL8iG7/pSAb3H41y0Hk15rVre2872JWbxZjuiUzqoi 2Cgfq9duyurIissI/LbQUWwSaftZWMvh0D47yS2KHBb0riyW6qLz31UWoWruTIch BCHZd/rAcoMqleTCS7yyHwU2zzcqHVxiZO/h09Ca8TiLLpRSWV/+CENXYpWjddy/ 7XK//jk2Ho/J+TrZ6L87vJnjAj7dqHN4BHC2NmgjnXdGZqM5GtjjWLbLa4gZkc8W xMRsXOx9O9OOMLee3rrsz/zcDM+NsCVdxFC/gMXFCQwyLpQYJyBMastmutFLqj31 jlZcs94uNLe1pna52SdyuHaCA1ySXTUSTiT+7OUQUsSjKypwPer31WiVGc+GzWFu SWP9ggdOgqFIO5V5PJ8Fg1R+J8YOG/I8xaiP9S8HHM35qiikpboSzdGwE1+Cl6Lu QgsJNY/r =KDXa -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>, 1006000-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1006000: transition: draco
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 3 Mar 2022 23:35:39 +0100
- Message-id: <YiFCuxgOEPdnnJHP@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <YhExHgf7OJiyPwcd@ramacher.at>
- References: <164521118074.225089.15535057325773531974.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <164521118074.225089.15535057325773531974.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <YhExHgf7OJiyPwcd@ramacher.at>
On 2022-02-19 19:04:14 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html > > On 2022-02-18 20:06:20 +0100, Timo Röhling wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear release team, > > > > I would like to transition draco for its new SONAME. > > The Ben tracker at > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-draco.html looks fine. > > I rebuilt all reverse dependencies on amd64 successfully. > > Please go ahead The old binary packages got removed from testing. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---