[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#1003599: transition: octave



Le samedi 22 janvier 2022 à 09:27 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> On 2022-01-21 22:45:31 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > On 2022-01-18 19:25:08 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > Le mardi 18 janvier 2022 à 19:18 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > > > On 2022-01-18 09:11:01 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > > > Le lundi 17 janvier 2022 à 11:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot a écrit :
> > > > > > Le dimanche 16 janvier 2022 à 21:11 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher a écrit :
> > > > > > > On 2022-01-12 13:46:03 +0100, Sébastien Villemot wrote:
> > > > > > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > > > > > Severity: normal
> > > > > > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > > > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > > > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-octave@lists.debian.org
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > > Please schedule a transition for octave 6.4, which is currently in
> > > > > > > > experimental. All Octave add-ons need to be recompiled, because of a change in
> > > > > > > > the interface exposed to them.
> > > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > 
> > > > > > > Please go ahead
> > > > > > 
> > > > > > Thanks. octave 6.4.0-2 has been uploaded to unstable, and compiled on
> > > > > > all release architectures.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The recompilation process is almost completed. The only remaining
> > > > > problem is octave-tisean which fails to rebuild on s390x (see #874116,
> > > > > which is a long-standing issue).
> > > > > 
> > > > > octave-tisean is a leaf package, so I suggest to remove it from
> > > > > testing, so that we can complete the transition.
> > > > 
> > > > Removal hint added.
> > > > 
> > > > Note that octave-database's autopkgtest on armhf regressed. See
> > > > https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/o/octave-database/18432401/log.gz
> > > > for the log
> > > 
> > > I’ve tried to reproduce the failure on abel.d.o, but the autopkgtest
> > > succeeded. I have no clue about the problem. If this is an option for
> > > you, then I would simply force the migration despite the bad test.
> > 
> > Bug filed (#1004158) and hint added.
> 
> … and it's done.

Thanks a lot for your help!

-- 
⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Sébastien Villemot
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  Debian Developer
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  https://sebastien.villemot.name
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  https://www.debian.org

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


Reply to: