[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#994584: marked as done (nmu: ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5)

Your message dated Fri, 19 Nov 2021 21:41:41 +0100
with message-id <YZgMBYs5avYi2nk3@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#994584: nmu: ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5
has caused the Debian Bug report #994584,
regarding nmu: ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
994584: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994584
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu
Control: affects -1 + ricochet-im
X-Debbugs-CC: ricochet-im@packages.debian.org

Please rebuild ricochet-im in bullseye and unstable, the transition
from GCC 9 to 10 seems to have changed the size of the C++ type Type
which is breaking a runtime check of the size, the runtime error is:

/usr/include/c++/9/bits/move.h:194:7: runtime error: load of value 279, which is not a valid value for type 'Type'

I confirmed that rebuilding ricochet-im is enough to fix the error.

The binNMUs that need scheduling are:

nmu ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5 . ANY . bullseye . -m "Rebuild for the GCC 10 transition (Closes #992668)"
nmu ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for the GCC 10 transition (Closes #992668)"

-- 
bye,
pabs

https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-09-21 13:09:25 +0800, Paul Wise wrote:
> On Sat, 18 Sep 2021 13:58:56 +0800 Paul Wise wrote:
> 
> > nmu ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild for the GCC 10 transition (Closes #992668)"
> 
> This appears to have been completed.
> 
> > nmu ricochet-im_1.1.4-3+b5 . ANY . bullseye . -m "Rebuild for the GCC 10 transition (Closes #992668)"
> 
> This doesn't appear to have been scheduled yet.

Let's close this until we actually know what's causing #992668

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: