[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#998344: buster-pu: package llvm-toolchain-11/1:11.0.1-2~deb10u1



On 10/11/2021 15:03, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
On Wed, Nov 10, 2021 at 09:00:50AM +0100, Emilio Pozuelo Monfort wrote:
On 09/11/2021 21:00, Roberto C. Sánchez wrote:
Hi Adam,

On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 02:20:35PM +0000, Adam D. Barratt wrote:
On Tue, 2021-11-02 at 13:28 -0400, Roberto C. Sanchez wrote:
In order to support the update of rustc in buster, which in turn is
needed to support the updates of firefox-esr and thunderbird, I am
proposing an update of llvm-toolchain-11 in buster.  The attached
diff represents the change from the current package in the buster-
backports repository.

That diff appears to be between the git branches, rather than the
generated packages. Would it be possible to have a source debdiff
between your base and the package you're planning to upload?

I rebased my changes on 11.0.1-2 from buster.  The debdiff attached to
this email represents the updated packge I am proposing for upload.

I think you mean from bullseye?

Yes, quite right.  I did in fact mean bullseye.  The target suite is
buster, but the source package I am basing the update on is from
bullseye.  I must have confused myself.

Note that I also updated the version of the proposed package to
11.0.1-2+deb10u1.

That should be 11.0.1-2~deb10u1, to be lower than the version in bullseye.

Again, it appears I successfully confounded myself :-/

I have updated the version to 11.0.1-2~deb10u1 and attached an updated
debdiff that reflects the corrected version.  Thanks for catching this,
Emilio.

As a side note, the version I have for the stretch upload is
11.0.1-2~deb9u1.

Thanks for the updated debdiff. Do you have an eta for the mips build? It'd be nice to have confirmation that that indeed builds fine.

btw minor nitpick, but the clang-tools install change isn't mentioned in the changelog. Would be nice to have that fixed before the actual upload, but no need to send another debdiff just for that.

Cheers,
Emilio


Reply to: