Your message dated Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:14:57 +0100 with message-id <YYmTUaR+iL9bjM4n@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#998200: transition: bibutils has caused the Debian Bug report #998200, regarding transition: bibutils to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 998200: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998200 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: bibutils
- From: Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org>
- Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2021 22:32:05 +0100
- Message-id: <163571592518.302046.12232221456061003000.reportbug@mendelssohn>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Dear Release Team, I am preparing the transition from libbibutils7 to libbibutils8, which is in experimental and builds well. This change is needed as the ABI has encountered many changes by upstream. Ben file: title = "bibutils"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libbibutils7" | .depends ~ "libbibutils8"; is_good = .depends ~ "libbibutils8"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libbibutils7"; The auto-transitioner page [1] is fine. Here are the results of the test builds of the 5 reverse dependencies: * bibutils build OK in experimental (same source package as libbibutils8) * haskell-hs-bibutils build OK, binNMU needed for the dependencies list of libghc-hs-bibutils-dev * haskell-pandoc-citeproc build OK * haskell-blogliterately build OK * haskell-hakyll build OK Best regards, Pierre [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-bibutils.html
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Pierre Gruet <pgt@debian.org>, 998200-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#998200: transition: bibutils
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Nov 2021 22:14:57 +0100
- Message-id: <YYmTUaR+iL9bjM4n@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <YYHK/oaD5XKaU8tp@ramacher.at>
- References: <163571592518.302046.12232221456061003000.reportbug@mendelssohn> <163571592518.302046.12232221456061003000.reportbug@mendelssohn> <YYHK/oaD5XKaU8tp@ramacher.at>
On 2021-11-03 00:34:22 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-bibutils.html > > On 2021-10-31 22:32:05, Pierre Gruet wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > Severity: normal > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > I am preparing the transition from libbibutils7 to libbibutils8, which is in experimental and builds well. > > This change is needed as the ABI has encountered many changes by upstream. > > Please go ahead libbibutils7 got removed from testing. Cheers > > Cheers > > > > > Ben file: > > > > title = "bibutils"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libbibutils7" | .depends ~ "libbibutils8"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "libbibutils8"; > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libbibutils7"; > > > > The auto-transitioner page [1] is fine. > > > > Here are the results of the test builds of the 5 reverse dependencies: > > > > * bibutils build OK in experimental (same source package as libbibutils8) > > * haskell-hs-bibutils build OK, binNMU needed for the dependencies list of libghc-hs-bibutils-dev > > * haskell-pandoc-citeproc build OK > > * haskell-blogliterately build OK > > * haskell-hakyll build OK > > > > Best regards, > > Pierre > > > > [1] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-bibutils.html > > > > -- > Sebastian Ramacher > -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---