[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#990991: marked as done (nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3)

Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2021 23:19:44 +0200
with message-id <YOyx8JmtgZnu6qkA@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#990991: nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #990991,
regarding nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
990991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990991
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

nmu atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."

The maintainer-uploaded amd64 binaries have dependencies on packages in
experimental.
libatlas-ecmwf-0 is M-A: same, therefore ANY instead of only amd64.

Andreas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-07-12 14:57:08 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: binnmu
> 
> nmu atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment."
> 
> The maintainer-uploaded amd64 binaries have dependencies on packages in
> experimental.
> libatlas-ecmwf-0 is M-A: same, therefore ANY instead of only amd64.

Scheduled. But that't wont make atlas-ecmwf migrate if that's what
you're after.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: