Hi Adrian Am 12.07.21 um 14:51 schrieb Adrian Bunk:
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Background: https://www.debian.org/releases/testing/amd64/release-notes/ch-information.en.html#openstack-cgroups https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959022#66 I noticed a version of libcgroup with support for control groups v2 is now in experimental. Given then known problems with the libcgroup currently in bullseye (it only works when booting with special kernel parameters), this bug is a question to the release team and the OpenStack maintainer whether updating libcgroup in bullseye to the version currently in experimental might be the smaller evil compared to the current release notes approach. Complete diffstat compared to the version in testing: 223 files changed, 73421 insertions(+), 34626 deletions(-) Diff of debian/ is attached. The new version adds autopkgtests, but they aren't currently run: SKIP Test requires machine-level isolation but testbed does not provide that No new bugs are reported in the BTS.
This was already discussed in https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=959022My takeaway from that discussion was, that rdeps of cgroup-tools, would itself have to be made cgroupv2 aware, especially OpenStack and its components. Have those rdeps been tested successfully with libcgroup/cgroup-tools from experimental?
Regards, Michael
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature