[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#990931: marked as done (unblock: ssldump/1.3-2)



Your message dated Sun, 11 Jul 2021 18:46:24 +0000
with message-id <E1m2eTA-00039v-VX@respighi.debian.org>
and subject line unblock ssldump
has caused the Debian Bug report #990931,
regarding unblock: ssldump/1.3-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
990931: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990931
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package ssldump

  * Install README.md not README (a symlink) (Closes: #986082)
(change by Sophie Brun)

Replacing a dead link README with the actual file should
qualify as documentation change.
diff -Nru ssldump-1.3/debian/changelog ssldump-1.3/debian/changelog
--- ssldump-1.3/debian/changelog	2021-02-03 16:00:31.000000000 +0200
+++ ssldump-1.3/debian/changelog	2021-04-07 12:43:40.000000000 +0300
@@ -1,3 +1,9 @@
+ssldump (1.3-2) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Install README.md not README (a symlink) (Closes: #986082)
+
+ -- Sophie Brun <sophie@offensive-security.com>  Wed, 07 Apr 2021 11:43:40 +0200
+
 ssldump (1.3-1) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * New upstream version 1.3
diff -Nru ssldump-1.3/debian/docs ssldump-1.3/debian/docs
--- ssldump-1.3/debian/docs	2021-02-03 16:00:31.000000000 +0200
+++ ssldump-1.3/debian/docs	2021-04-07 12:43:40.000000000 +0300
@@ -1,2 +1,2 @@
 CREDITS
-README
+README.md

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Unblocked.

--- End Message ---

Reply to: