Hi Emmanuel, On 01-05-2021 14:43, Emmanuel Bourg wrote: > I agree the diff is not reviewable, but it can be seen as an update of > the DCEVM code to the same state as the OpenJDK code that was already > accepted in testing. The extra DCEVM patches were simply rebased with no > changes on top of OpenJDK 11.0.11 [1]. I missed so far that apparently DCEVM is a patch set to the same OpenJDK we already have in the archive. Is it feasible, i.e. does it make sense and would it help us review it, if you generate a diff of patches, instead of the source diff that includes all the changes to OpenJDK (which we already have in bullseye)? Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature