[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#988070: unblock: libxml2/2.9.10+dfsg-6.5 (pre-approval)



Control: tags -1 confirmed

Hi Salvatore,

On 06/05/2021 10:56, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Control: retitle -1 unblock: libxml2/2.9.10+dfsg-6.6
(pre-approval)
On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 11:04:52PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Hi,

On Tue, May 04, 2021 at 09:19:20PM +0200, Salvatore Bonaccorso wrote:
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: carnil@debian.org

Dear release team

This is a pre-approval request to please unblock package libxml2 (not
yet uploaded to unstable, but to experimental so far as
2.9.10+dfsg-6.4).

Please unblock package libxml2

[ Reason ]

The update would fix three CVEs recently reported, CVE-2021-3516
(#987739), CVE-2021-3517 (#987738) and CVE-2021-3518 (#987737).
Which are not very severe but we still wanted to try to get fixes into
bullseye.

[ Impact ]

Package still affected by those CVEs.

[ Tests ]

For those three CVEs pocs are available, which I had tested before and
with the fix, except CVE-2021-3516, which I could not trigger the
issue, but the change is simple.

Furthermore given I uploaded to experimental there was additional
exposure by the autopkgtests. From those as you can see from
https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html
three marked regressions, but both balsa and kopanocore were already
before failing.  For libreoffice the tests somehow are flapping where
they fail, I do not see a relation to the libxml2 here. libreoffice
failed there in the last run for uicheck-sc test (triggered by
python3.9), but in the libxml2 case it failed for the uicheck-sw  test
and for the prvious failure it was again one other test.

To confirm: And in fact just one other run did not fail:
https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/unstable/amd64/libr/libreoffice/12125523/log.gz

Another CVE popped up, which I have included in a new upload, thus
retitling the bug and attaching the new debdiff.

Please go ahead and let us know once the package has been accepted.

Cheers,
Emilio


Reply to: