[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#983876: unblock: otrs2/6.0.32-1



Control: tags -1 moreinfo

Hi Patrick,

On 15-03-2021 15:12, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> reopen #983876
> thanks
> 
> Am 02.03.21 um 19:38 schrieb Paul Gevers:
>> Hi Patrick,
>>
>> On 02-03-2021 16:58, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>>> I just uploaded the otrs2 6.0.32 package to experimental.  Could I have your ACK for bullseye? :-)
>> otrs2 is neither a key package [1], nor listed on the (build-)essential
>> list [1]. As long as you follow the soft freeze rules [3] and ensure
>> that the package migrates before the start of the hard freeze
>> (12-03-2021), there is nothing for us to unblock. I'm wondering if and
>> suspect that you are asking our permission to upload a new upstream
>> source. It's hardly doable for us to do that for all packages in Debian,
>> so we expect you honor the freeze rules and make the judgement yourself
>> if a new upstream version for your package is appropriate at this state.
>>
>> Paul
>>
>> [1] https://udd.debian.org/cgi-bin/key_packages.yaml.cgi
>> [2] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/essential-and-build-essential.txt
>> [3] https://release.debian.org/bullseye/freeze_policy.html#soft
>>
> Hi,
> 
> I uploaded the release to unstable just one hour after your mail and
> there were still 10 days for the package to migrate. But the migration
> process was not done before the freeze so now I need an unblock:
> 
>   * Migration status for otrs2 (6.0.30-2 to 6.0.32-2): BLOCKED: Needs an
>     approval (either due to a freeze, the source suite or a manual hint)
>   * Too young, only 12 of 20 days old
> 
> Now it needs also 10 days more, but in two days 6.0.30 should be
> AUTORMed from testing :(
> 

The diff is not reviewable:

 5637 files changed, 151250 insertions(+), 29937 deletions(-)

If you think you can provide a diff that can be reviewed, please provide
one, but please show how you filtered the diff too.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: