Your message dated Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:47:17 +0100 with message-id <YEZ/RcIQw8JXaZFC@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#984679: unblock elfutils/0.183-2 has caused the Debian Bug report #984679, regarding pre-approval: unblock elfutils/0.183-2 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 984679: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=984679 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: unblock elfutils/0.183-2
- From: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org>
- Date: Sat, 06 Mar 2021 19:03:17 -0500
- Message-id: <[🔎] 87blbvu8xm.fsf@paluero>
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: unblock Severity: normal Hi, Please unblock elfutils/0.183-2. I have just uploaded this version to address <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983434>, which is about enabling the use of https://debuginfod.debian.net by default if the user chooses to do so when presented with a new debconf question. This is not an upload of a new upstream version, but it adds a new binary package (libdebuginfod-common) which holds the debconf template for the new question. The package is currently in NEW. In all fairness, I am not entirely sure whether this requires an unblock bug, but I decided to be safe and file one. Thanks in advance, -- Sergio GPG key ID: 237A 54B1 0287 28BF 00EF 31F4 D0EB 7628 65FC 5E36 Please send encrypted e-mail if possible https://sergiodj.net/Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Sergio Durigan Junior <sergiodj@debian.org>, 984679-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#984679: unblock elfutils/0.183-2
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 8 Mar 2021 20:47:17 +0100
- Message-id: <YEZ/RcIQw8JXaZFC@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 87blbvu8xm.fsf@paluero>
- References: <[🔎] 87blbvu8xm.fsf@paluero>
On 2021-03-06 19:03:17 -0500, Sergio Durigan Junior wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: unblock > Severity: normal > > Hi, > > Please unblock elfutils/0.183-2. > > I have just uploaded this version to address > <https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=983434>, which is > about enabling the use of https://debuginfod.debian.net by default if > the user chooses to do so when presented with a new debconf question. > > This is not an upload of a new upstream version, but it adds a new > binary package (libdebuginfod-common) which holds the debconf > template for the new question. The package is currently in NEW. > > In all fairness, I am not entirely sure whether this requires an unblock > bug, but I decided to be safe and file one. It does, since elfutils is a key package. It's too late in the cycle to add new binary to a key package. From the discussion on debian-devel I understand that users can enable the service without the new package. So I'd recommend to document debuginfod.d.n and how to configure it in the release notes instead. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---