Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:17:19 +0100 with message-id <Ybu673TehlI9UEg7@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#1000628: transition: libotf has caused the Debian Bug report #1000628, regarding transition: libotf to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 1000628: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000628 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: submit@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: transition: libotf
- From: Harshula <harshula@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 25 Nov 2021 22:28:05 +0100
- Message-id: <85d5a71e-4db6-267f-5c10-69ee2b7013d1@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition Hi Release Team,Upstream incremented libotf's SONAME from 0 to 1. The latest upstream version is packaged and available in experimental. I want to upload it to unstable.Auto-generated tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libotf.html The following source packages need binNMUs: m17n-lib emacs Ben file: title = "libotf"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libotf1" | .depends ~ "libotf0"; is_good = .depends ~ "libotf1"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libotf0"; The reverse dependencies were successfully built locally by pbuilder: $ ldd /usr/lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libm17n-gui.so | grep otf libotf.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libotf.so.1 (0x00007fa9943b8000) $ ldd /usr/bin/m17n-edit | grep otf libotf.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libotf.so.1 (0x00007f6472821000) $ ldd /usr/bin/emacs-gtk | grep otf libotf.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libotf.so.1 (0x00007f7d9456e000) $ ldd /usr/bin/emacs-lucid | grep otf libotf.so.1 => /lib/x86_64-linux-gnu/libotf.so.1 (0x00007f6686afd000) Thanks, Harshula
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Harshula <harshula@debian.org>, 1000628-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#1000628: transition: libotf
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 23:17:19 +0100
- Message-id: <Ybu673TehlI9UEg7@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] e7433696-0fb4-8344-c260-fa7772541285@debian.org>
- References: <85d5a71e-4db6-267f-5c10-69ee2b7013d1@debian.org> <YaCWtrYQDpwBhF57@ramacher.at> <85d5a71e-4db6-267f-5c10-69ee2b7013d1@debian.org> <[🔎] fae629c0-2e2a-cdc5-54d9-db10cd904284@debian.org> <[🔎] Yafp5kHFu57CreYc@ramacher.at> <85d5a71e-4db6-267f-5c10-69ee2b7013d1@debian.org> <[🔎] e7433696-0fb4-8344-c260-fa7772541285@debian.org>
On 2021-12-02 12:15:33 +0100, Harshula wrote: > On 1/12/21 22:32, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > > > I have already scheduled the binNMUs. See > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libotf.html > > Thanks! libotf0 got removed from testing. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---