Your message dated Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:16:03 +0100 with message-id <77d28e17-4530-8501-d796-06928a616927@debian.org> and subject line Re: release.debian.org: better wording for "old bugs" has caused the Debian Bug report #884489, regarding release.debian.org: better wording for "old bugs" to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 884489: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=884489 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: release.debian.org: better wording for "old bugs"
- From: Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:24:24 +0100
- Message-id: <151336946450.14041.6116527031297333131.reportbug@taurus.defre.kleine-koenig.org>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: britney Hello, a few days ago (i.e. before libupnp migrated to testing) I saw on tracker.d.o: Updating libupnp fixes old bugs: ... I wondered what an "old bug" is given that this bug was only a few days old. After asking in #debian-mentors I think it would be easier to understand if this was reworded to Updating libupnp fixes bugs in testing: ... adsb pointed out (in irc) that "testing" isn't right for all users of britney, but I guess there is a solution to that. Best regards Uwe
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 884489-done@bugs.debian.org, Uwe Kleine-König <ukleinek@debian.org>
- Subject: Re: release.debian.org: better wording for "old bugs"
- From: Paul Gevers <elbrus@debian.org>
- Date: Thu, 16 Dec 2021 21:16:03 +0100
- Message-id: <77d28e17-4530-8501-d796-06928a616927@debian.org>
- In-reply-to: <151336946450.14041.6116527031297333131.reportbug@taurus.defre.kleine-koenig.org>
- References: <151336946450.14041.6116527031297333131.reportbug@taurus.defre.kleine-koenig.org> <151336946450.14041.6116527031297333131.reportbug@taurus.defre.kleine-koenig.org>
Hi Uwe,On Fri, 15 Dec 2017 21:24:24 +0100 =?utf-8?q?Uwe_Kleine-K=C3=B6nig?= <ukleinek@debian.org> wrote:a few days ago (i.e. before libupnp migrated to testing) I saw on tracker.d.o: Updating libupnp fixes old bugs: ... I wondered what an "old bug" is given that this bug was only a few days old. After asking in #debian-mentors I think it would be easier to understand if this was reworded to Updating libupnp fixes bugs in testing: ... adsb pointed out (in irc) that "testing" isn't right for all users of britney, but I guess there is a solution to that.I just pushed a change that fixes this issue. PaulAttachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
--- End Message ---