Bug#1000374: marked as done (transition: opencv)

["Debian Bug Tracking System" <owner@bugs.debian.org>]

Your message dated Sun, 12 Dec 2021 16:24:43 +0100
with message-id <YbYUO2uSXXgzEHyi@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#1000374: transition: opencv
has caused the Debian Bug report #1000374,
regarding transition: opencv
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
1000374: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=1000374
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
• Subject: transition: opencv
• From: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>
• Date: Mon, 22 Nov 2021 10:26:43 +0100
• Message-id: <163757320385.22771.837860226351575981.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de>

Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

Dear release team,

I would like to transition OpenCV with a bumped SOVERSION after
an ABI breakage by upstream [1].

The Ben file [2] looks good.


Cheers
Timo

[1] https://github.com/opencv/opencv/issues/20878
[2] https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-opencv.html


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
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=8Q2P
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--- End Message ---

--- Begin Message ---

• To: Timo Röhling <roehling@debian.org>, 1000374-done@bugs.debian.org
• Subject: Re: Bug#1000374: transition: opencv
• From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
• Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2021 16:24:43 +0100
• Message-id: <YbYUO2uSXXgzEHyi@ramacher.at>
• In-reply-to: <YZ/8ROuvsDnBjMxY@ramacher.at>
• References: <163757320385.22771.837860226351575981.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <YZvwu43uJwDxR/fy@ramacher.at> <163757320385.22771.837860226351575981.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <20211125203730.6xcsvict4kqqewv6@mail.gaussglocke.de> <163757320385.22771.837860226351575981.reportbug@roehling.fkie.fraunhofer.de> <YZ/8ROuvsDnBjMxY@ramacher.at>

On 2021-11-25 22:12:36 +0100, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> Control: tags -1 = confirmed
> 
> On 2021-11-25 21:37:30, Timo Röhling wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> > * Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> [2021-11-22 20:34]:
> > > Why does the name of the -java package get changed? For the Java ABI
> > > nothing changes in this case. If you compare the produced class files,
> > > the only difference is that libopencv_java454d.so is loaded instead of
> > > libopencv_java454.so.
> > I gave it some more thought (and discussed it with Jochen), and I
> > ended up reverting that rename, back to libopencv4.5-java, for
> > 4.5.4+dfsg-5 in experimental.
> 
> Alright, please go ahead

The old packages got removed from testing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature

--- End Message ---