[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#998192: marked as done (release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26)

Your message dated Wed, 8 Dec 2021 12:16:41 +0100
with message-id <YbCUGSCoE9fnXTiw@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#998192: release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26
has caused the Debian Bug report #998192,
regarding release.debian.org: Transition for gsl-2.7 / libgsl26
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
998192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=998192
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

GNU GSL 2.7 was release a few months ago, and we now realised (in the
discussion of #993324 which also included upstream) that the upstream libtool
instruction were in error by _not_ leading to a new sonumber. This was
corrected in (source package) gsl upload 2.7-3 to experimental, which built
well.

I would like to ask for a formal transition. As we saw with failing tests in
dependent packages, binNMUs will not work for all package (but possibly
"most"). 

Tentative ben file below.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
title = "gsl 2.7 transition";
is_affected = .depends ~ /libgsl-dev/;
is_good = .depends ~ "libgsl26";
is_bad = .depends ~ "libgsl25";
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Let me know if I can help otherwise.

Cheers, Dirk


-- 
https://dirk.eddelbuettel.com | @eddelbuettel | edd@debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-12-06 15:52:01 -0600, Dirk Eddelbuettel wrote:
> 
> Hi Mattia and Sebastian,
> 
> On 6 December 2021 at 22:44, Mattia Rizzolo wrote:
> | Yes!  See https://wiki.debian.org/BuildProfileSpec for the
> | documentation.
> | 
> | Unfortunately there have been a few troubles getting a formal and good
> | specifical text that was "good enough" for the Debian Policy.
> 
> Ack, and understood.  Using 'Profiles' instead of 'Options' is clear.
> 
> I applied the patch, catching one typo (just two-chars switched in the
> updated comments, nothing affecting functionality) and -3 is now in unstable.

Thanks!

gsl now migrated and libgsl25 got removed from testing.

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: