[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#995587: marked as done (transition: ruby3.0-add)

Your message dated Tue, 7 Dec 2021 23:22:57 +0100
with message-id <Ya/ewY64rcqdWlJd@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#995587: transition: ruby3.0-add
has caused the Debian Bug report #995587,
regarding transition: ruby3.0-add
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
995587: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995587
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults.

Ben file:

title = "ruby3.0-add";
is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/);
is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/;
is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/;

We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look
bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of
binNMUs

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-12-07 10:44:35 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> On Sat, 2 Oct 2021 15:14:39 -0300 Antonio Terceiro <terceiro@debian.org> wrote:
> > Package: release.debian.org
> > Severity: normal
> > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > Usertags: transition
> > 
> > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults.
> 
> This can now be closed. There are 4 unfixed packages in the tracker, but
> they are all out of testing. Some of them probably need to be removed
> from the archive entirely, but we will look at them later and give
> someone who cares a chance to fix them before that.

Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: