Control: tag -1 - moreinfo On Sat, Oct 16, 2021 at 03:46:11PM +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 moreinfo > > On 2021-10-15 06:44:36 -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2021 at 03:14:39PM -0300, Antonio Terceiro wrote: > > > Package: release.debian.org > > > Severity: normal > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > > Usertags: transition > > > > > > We would like to add support for ruby3.0 in ruby-defaults. > > > > > > Ben file: > > > > > > title = "ruby3.0-add"; > > > is_affected = (.depends ~ /ruby2.7 | .depends ~ /ruby3.0/) & !.source ~ /^(ruby2.7|ruby3.0|ruby-defaults)$/); > > > is_good = .depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > is_bad = .depends ~ /ruby2.7/ & !.depends ~ /ruby3.0/; > > > > > > We already did a mass rebuild some time ago, and the results don't look > > > bad. We should be doing a new one soon, and will come up with a list of > > > binNMUs > > > > This is a friendly ping. We would like to make the switch in unstable > > soon and start doing binNMUs. > > > > We have these bugs related to this transition: > > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/pkgreport.cgi?tag=ruby3.0;users=debian-ruby@lists.debian.org > > > > Most of those bugs are for leaf libraries. We already started fixing the > > ones that block a lof of other (e.g. the ones with C extensions that > > FTBFS with ruby3.0) so they are ready to be binNMUed. > > ruby3.0 isn't in testing yet - it currently fails to build on ppc64el. > So let's at least wait until it migrated. ruby3.0 is now in testing. Can we go ahead with this?
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature