Bug#996192: marked as done (unblock: net-snmp/5.9.1+dfsg-3)
Your message dated Tue, 12 Oct 2021 09:58:18 +0200
with message-id <YWVAGpGezi9oszxD@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#996192: unblock: net-snmp/5.9.1+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #996192,
regarding unblock: net-snmp/5.9.1+dfsg-3
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
996192: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=996192
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Please unblock package net-snmp
[ Reason ]
net-snmp is not moving into bookworm due to a regression with
pyagentx. However there is reason to believe this is due to
a race condition in pyagentx test script
https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pyagentx/-/merge_requests/2
[ Impact ]
net-snmp will stay at 5.9, specifically the AES improvements
will not be there and anything else that was added in the
last year.
[ Tests ]
net-snmp passes all its autopkg tests see
https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=net-snmp
[ Risks ]
I see no risk, the issue is pyagentx failing its tests.
It's not a linking issue, pyagentx is pure python but
uses snmpd to test itself. The problem is that if
the agentx starts faster than snmpd the test fails
because it cannot connect to the socket.
[ Checklist ]
[x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
[x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
[x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
[ Other info ]
unblock net-snmp/5.9.1+dfsg-3
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2021-10-12 13:12:53, Craig Small wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
>
> Please unblock package net-snmp
>
> [ Reason ]
> net-snmp is not moving into bookworm due to a regression with
> pyagentx. However there is reason to believe this is due to
> a race condition in pyagentx test script
> https://salsa.debian.org/python-team/packages/pyagentx/-/merge_requests/2
>
> [ Impact ]
> net-snmp will stay at 5.9, specifically the AES improvements
> will not be there and anything else that was added in the
> last year.
>
> [ Tests ]
> net-snmp passes all its autopkg tests see
> https://qa.debian.org/excuses.php?package=net-snmp
>
> [ Risks ]
> I see no risk, the issue is pyagentx failing its tests.
> It's not a linking issue, pyagentx is pure python but
> uses snmpd to test itself. The problem is that if
> the agentx starts faster than snmpd the test fails
> because it cannot connect to the socket.
>
> [ Checklist ]
> [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
> [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
> [x] attach debdiff against the package in testing
>
> [ Other info ]
>
> unblock net-snmp/5.9.1+dfsg-3
Thanks for the analaysis. Hint added
Cheers
--
Sebastian Ramacher
--- End Message ---
Reply to: