[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#994086: marked as done (transition: netcdf)

Your message dated Mon, 11 Oct 2021 21:33:25 +0200
with message-id <YWSRhYAPWV4AjNyp@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#994086: transition: netcdf
has caused the Debian Bug report #994086,
regarding transition: netcdf
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
994086: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=994086
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-netcdf.html
Control: block -1 by 994003 991057 993992

The SONAME for NetCDF was bumped in 4.8.0 requiring a transition.

Most rdeps built successfully, exception grace, gri, and ncl
which FTBFS for unrelated reasons.


Transition: netcdf

 libnetcdf18 (1:4.7.4-1) -> libnetcdf19 (1:4.8.1-1~exp1)

The status of the most recent rebuilds is as follows.

 adios              (1.13.1-28.2)             OK
 cmor               (3.6.1-1)                 OK
 coda               (2.22.1-1)                OK
 dx                 (1:4.4.4-13)              OK
 eccodes            (2.23.0-1)                OK
 exodusii           (6.02.dfsg.1-8)           OK
 gdal               (3.3.2+dfsg-1)            OK
 gerris             (20131206+dfsg-19)        OK
 grace              (1:5.1.25-9)              FTBFS (#994003)
 grads              (3:2.2.1-4)               OK
 gri                (2.12.27-1)               FTBFS (#991057)
 kst                (2.0.8-4)                 OK
 labplot            (2.8.2-1)                 OK
 libminc            (2.4.03-3)                OK
 libpdl-netcdf-perl (4.22-2)                  OK
 nco                (5.0.1-1)                 OK
 ncview             (2.1.8+ds-4)              OK
 netcdf-cxx         (4.3.1-3)                 OK
 netcdf-cxx-legacy  (4.2-12)                  OK
 netcdf-fortran     (4.5.3+ds-2)              OK
 netcdf4-python     (1.5.7-1)                 OK
 octave-netcdf      (1.0.14-1)                OK
 pymol              (2.4.0+dfsg-2)            OK
 r-cran-ncdf4       (1.17-2)                  OK
 r-cran-rnetcdf     (2.5-2-1)                 OK
 ruby-netcdf        (0.7.2-5)                 OK
 v-sim              (3.7.2-8)                 OK

 abinit             (9.2.2-1)                 OK
 cdftools           (3.0.2-4)                 OK
 emoslib            (2:4.5.9-7)               OK
 etsf-io            (1.0.4-5)                 OK
 ferret-vis         (7.6.0-2)                 OK
 gmt                (6.2.0+dfsg-1)            OK
 gnudatalanguage    (1.0.0-4)                 OK
 grass              (7.8.5-2)                 OK
 harp               (1.13-1)                  OK
 metkit             (1.8.4-1)                 OK
 minc-tools         (2.3.00+dfsg-6)           OK
 ncl                (6.6.2-8)                 FTBFS (#993992)
 oasis3             (3.mct+dfsg.121022-15)    OK
 paraview           (5.9.0-2)                 OK
 python-escript     (5.6-3)                   OK
 vtk6               (6.3.0+dfsg2-8.1)         OK
 vtk7               (7.1.1+dfsg2-10)          OK
 vtk9               (9.0.1+dfsg1-8)           OK

 lammps             (20210122~gita77bb+ds1-2) OK
 magics++           (4.9.0-1)                 OK
 pyferret           (7.6.3-3)                 OK
 qgis               (3.16.10+dfsg-1)          OK

 cdo                (2.0.0~rc5-1)             OK
 metview            (5.13.0-1)                OK


Kind Regards,

Bas

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-10-06 10:36:05 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> On 2021-10-06 06:42:42, Sebastiaan Couwenberg wrote:
> > Testing still lacks a few rebuilt packages for this transition.
> > 
> > labplot should migrated in two days.
> > 
> > pymol will be rebuilt in unstable after it gets out the DELAYED
> > according to #995666, although I don't see it at
> > 
> >  ftp://ftp.upload.debian.org/pub/UploadQueue/DELAYED/
> 
> You can find the deferred queue at https://ftp-master.debian.org/deferred.html
> 
> Cheers
> 
> > 
> > magics++ & metkit are blocked by eckit which is no longer built on 32bit
> > architectures, and is waiting for ftpmaster to act on #993624.

The old binaries have been removed from testing. Closing

Cheers
-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: