[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#995415: marked as done (unblock: theano/1.0.5+dfsg-3 - not really a regression)

Your message dated Thu, 30 Sep 2021 22:14:37 +0200
with message-id <ecb5fd53-70f9-9a0c-f53f-948680a9b10e@debian.org>
and subject line Re: Bug#995415: unblock: theano/1.0.5+dfsg-3 - not really a regression
has caused the Debian Bug report #995415,
regarding unblock: theano/1.0.5+dfsg-3 - not really a regression
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
995415: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=995415
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
Severity: normal
theano 1.0.5+dfsg-3 is currently held in unstable for an autopkgtest "regression" on armhf.
The test in question (smoketestgpu) is currently skipped in plain testing because it depends on clblas (not in testing) and is marked skip-not-installable. When it is run with the testing version of theano, it fails with the same message. theano 1.0.5+dfsg-2 + clblas: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/t/theano/15627483/log.gz theano 1.0.5+dfsg-3 + clblast: https://ci.debian.net/data/autopkgtest/testing/armhf/t/theano/15629750/log.gz
theano 1.0.5+dfsg-3 removes the skip-not-installable (#993107) and replaces clblas by clblast.
(I suspect the underlying issue is actually a pocl bug triggered by gcc-11, but I can't prove that: this request is based on "not new", not "not mine".)
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Rebecca,

On 30-09-2021 21:32, Rebecca N. Palmer wrote:
> (I suspect the underlying issue is actually a pocl bug triggered by
> gcc-11, but I can't prove that: this request is based on "not new", not
> "not mine".)

I'll grant you this one time, but as from the release process view this
is still an autopkgtest regression I'd like you to disable the test on
armhf (the new Architecture field in d/t/control) in your next upload if
you can't solve the underlying issue.

Paul

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: