[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#993394: marked as done (transition: glibc 2.32)

Your message dated Wed, 22 Sep 2021 08:52:26 +0200
with message-id <YUrSqv6iYWRpvo9m@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#993394: transition: glibc 2.32
has caused the Debian Bug report #993394,
regarding transition: glibc 2.32
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
993394: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=993394
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition
X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org

Dear release team,

I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.32. It has been built
successfully on all release architectures except mips*el, however I have
successfully built them manually on eller.d.o. It also builds fine on most
ports architectures.

As glibc is using symbol versioning, there is no soname change. That
said a few packages are using libc internal symbols and have to be
rebuilt for this transition:
- apitrace
- dante
- gcc-9 (s390x only)
- libnih
- libnss-db
- unscd
- zeek

Here is the corresponding ben file:
  title = "glibc";
  is_affected = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<</;
  is_good = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.33\)/;
  is_bad = .depends ~ /libc[0-9.]* \(<< 2.32\)/;

In addition a few new symbols have been added that might prevent a few
other packages to migrate to testing until glibc migrates if they pick
up the new symbols, however those are really limited in this version.

Thanks for considering.

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-09-05 23:40:59 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> Hi Sebastian,
> 
> On 2021-09-05 19:15, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
> > Control: tags -1 confirmed
> > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/glibc-2.32.html
> > 
> > On 2021-09-02 22:11:50 +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > On 2021-08-31 20:54, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> > > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > > Severity: normal
> > > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > > Usertags: transition
> > > > X-Debbugs-Cc: debian-glibc@lists.debian.org
> > > > 
> > > > Dear release team,
> > > > 
> > > > I would like to get a transition slot for glibc 2.32. It has been built
> > > > successfully on all release architectures except mips*el, however I have
> > > > successfully built them manually on eller.d.o. It also builds fine on most
> > > > ports architectures.
> > > 
> > > It has been finally built on mipsel and mips64el, successfully.
> > 
> > Please go ahead.
> 
> Thanks, I have just uploaded it.

glibc migrated. Closing.

Cheers

> 
> Cheers,
> Aurelien
> 
> -- 
> Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
> aurelien@aurel32.net                 http://www.aurel32.net



-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: