[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#992028: marked as done (transition: libidn)

Your message dated Sun, 5 Sep 2021 18:50:02 +0200
with message-id <YTT1OlJ3ohNHMKVz@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#992028: transition: libidn
has caused the Debian Bug report #992028,
regarding transition: libidn
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
992028: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992028
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: transition

Hello,

I want to transition libidn to a newer upstream version, and they
API/ABI bumped.  This is my first transition in many years, so I'm
looking for guidance here.

I have uploaded 1.38-1 to experimental, and it builds everywhere.  The
binary package libidn11 is replaced with libidn12; libidn11-dev renamed
to libidn-dev (adding a dummy package with the old name); and
libidn11-java is removed (not setup for java usage properly and <10
popcon).

Speaking as upstream of the package, I expect everything to build with
the new version, doing the API/ABI bump was a mistake but it is several
years old by now.

Reverse dependencies have been built here:
https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libidn/-/pipelines/273580

Some comments:

- clamav: libclamav-dev depends on libidn11-dev needessly:
  https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991976
- echoping: ftbfs otherwise too, not related to this
- clickhouse: ftbfs due to 2h build timeout on salsa, otherwise should
  be okay.

Is there anything more I should do now?  Let me know when I can upload
to unstable.

Ben file (based on auto-generated output on the webpage -- not sure this
is correct -- why doesn't it output something in the right format?):

title = "libidn";
is_affected = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn\-dev|libidn12|libidn11|libidn11\-java)\b/";
is_good = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn\-dev|libidn12)\b/";
is_bad = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn11|libidn11\-java)\b/";

/Simon

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-08-09 13:22:49 +0200, Simon Josefsson wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: transition
> 
> Hello,
> 
> I want to transition libidn to a newer upstream version, and they
> API/ABI bumped.  This is my first transition in many years, so I'm
> looking for guidance here.
> 
> I have uploaded 1.38-1 to experimental, and it builds everywhere.  The
> binary package libidn11 is replaced with libidn12; libidn11-dev renamed
> to libidn-dev (adding a dummy package with the old name); and
> libidn11-java is removed (not setup for java usage properly and <10
> popcon).
> 
> Speaking as upstream of the package, I expect everything to build with
> the new version, doing the API/ABI bump was a mistake but it is several
> years old by now.
> 
> Reverse dependencies have been built here:
> https://salsa.debian.org/debian/libidn/-/pipelines/273580
> 
> Some comments:
> 
> - clamav: libclamav-dev depends on libidn11-dev needessly:
>   https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991976
> - echoping: ftbfs otherwise too, not related to this
> - clickhouse: ftbfs due to 2h build timeout on salsa, otherwise should
>   be okay.
> 
> Is there anything more I should do now?  Let me know when I can upload
> to unstable.
> 
> Ben file (based on auto-generated output on the webpage -- not sure this
> is correct -- why doesn't it output something in the right format?):
> 
> title = "libidn";
> is_affected = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn\-dev|libidn12|libidn11|libidn11\-java)\b/";
> is_good = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn\-dev|libidn12)\b/";
> is_bad = .depends ~ "/\b(libidn11|libidn11\-java)\b/";

libidn11 and libidn11-java have been removed from testing. Closing.

Cheers

> 
> /Simon



-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: