Your message dated Mon, 30 Aug 2021 23:08:47 +0200 with message-id <YS1I37puIzxYmXPy@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#992382: transition: granite has caused the Debian Bug report #992382, regarding transition: granite to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 992382: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992382 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: granite
- From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 23:31:05 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 7c255296ce5dbcc8b286012c3a8fbbe99e00784a.camel@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-Cc: byang@debian.org Severity: normal Dear Release Team, I plan to start the transition as listed on this page: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-granite.html . The transition comes with SONAME bump in the new version of libgranite. There are 6 reverse build-dependencies, and I have verified that they can all be built successfully with libgranite in experimental: akira (ok) bookworm (ok) budgie-extras (ok) easyssh (ok) minder (ok) sequeler (ok) Ben file (the auto-generated one already looks ok): title = "granite"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libgranite5" | .depends ~ "libgranite6"; is_good = .depends ~ "libgranite6"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libgranite5"; The dependency chain is straightforward and we only needs binNMUs, so I expect it to be a smooth transition. Thanks, Boyuan YangAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 992382-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#992382: transition: granite
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 30 Aug 2021 23:08:47 +0200
- Message-id: <YS1I37puIzxYmXPy@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <YSPr/YE/FGveZlyj@ramacher.at>
- References: <[🔎] 7c255296ce5dbcc8b286012c3a8fbbe99e00784a.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 7c255296ce5dbcc8b286012c3a8fbbe99e00784a.camel@debian.org> <YSPr/YE/FGveZlyj@ramacher.at>
On 2021-08-23 20:42:05 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tasg -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-granite.html > > On 2021-08-17 23:31:05 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-Cc: byang@debian.org > > Severity: normal > > > > Dear Release Team, > > > > I plan to start the transition as listed on this page: > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-granite.html . > > > > The transition comes with SONAME bump in the new version of libgranite. There > > are 6 reverse build-dependencies, and I have verified that they can all be > > built successfully with libgranite in experimental: > > > > akira (ok) > > bookworm (ok) > > budgie-extras (ok) > > easyssh (ok) > > minder (ok) > > sequeler (ok) > > > > Ben file (the auto-generated one already looks ok): > > > > title = "granite"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libgranite5" | .depends ~ "libgranite6"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "libgranite6"; > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libgranite5"; > > > > The dependency chain is straightforward and we only needs binNMUs, so I expect > > it to be a smooth transition. > > Please go ahead libgranite5 got removed. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---