Your message dated Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:41:02 +0200 with message-id <YSPrvvyRJCf+To/Z@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#992316: transition: libavif has caused the Debian Bug report #992316, regarding transition: libavif to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 992316: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=992316 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: transition: libavif
- From: Boyuan Yang <byang@debian.org>
- Date: Tue, 17 Aug 2021 01:26:02 -0400
- Message-id: <[🔎] 58d7bc81280b8a2362076052f7ac4f1fd2ac58f6.camel@debian.org>
Package: release.debian.org User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: transition X-Debbugs-CC: byang@debian.org norbert@preining.info Severity: normal I plan to start libavif transition as shown in the following transition tracker: https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libavif.html The new version of libavif library has bumped SONAME and needs a transition. The only reverse build-dependency is kimageformats, and I have verified that the build would still pass with the new libavif currently in experimental. Example Ben file (the one currently on auto-libavif page should be ok): title = "libavif"; is_affected = .depends ~ "libavif9" | .depends ~ "libavif12"; is_good = .depends ~ "libavif12"; is_bad = .depends ~ "libavif9"; This would be a really tiny transition, and I expect that we can finish it very soon. Thanks, Boyuan YangAttachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: 992316-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#992316: transition: libavif
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2021 20:41:02 +0200
- Message-id: <YSPrvvyRJCf+To/Z@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] YRtct4o6eqgbtRl3@ramacher.at>
- References: <[🔎] 58d7bc81280b8a2362076052f7ac4f1fd2ac58f6.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] 58d7bc81280b8a2362076052f7ac4f1fd2ac58f6.camel@debian.org> <[🔎] YRtct4o6eqgbtRl3@ramacher.at>
On 2021-08-17 08:52:39 +0200, Sebastian Ramacher wrote: > Control: tags -1 confirmed > Control: forwarded -1 https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libavif.html > > On 2021-08-17 01:26:02 -0400, Boyuan Yang wrote: > > Package: release.debian.org > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > > Usertags: transition > > X-Debbugs-CC: byang@debian.org norbert@preining.info > > Severity: normal > > > > I plan to start libavif transition as shown in the following transition > > tracker: > > > > https://release.debian.org/transitions/html/auto-libavif.html > > > > The new version of libavif library has bumped SONAME and needs a transition. > > The only reverse build-dependency is kimageformats, and I have verified that > > the build would still pass with the new libavif currently in experimental. > > > > Example Ben file (the one currently on auto-libavif page should be ok): > > > > title = "libavif"; > > is_affected = .depends ~ "libavif9" | .depends ~ "libavif12"; > > is_good = .depends ~ "libavif12"; > > is_bad = .depends ~ "libavif9"; > > > > This would be a really tiny transition, and I expect that we can finish it > > very soon. > > Please go ahead. And libavif9 was removed from testing Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---