[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#991499: unblock: atftp/0.7.git20120829-3.3



Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock
X-Debbugs-Cc: andi@debian.org

Please unblock package atftp

[ Reason ]
It has been found and reported in #988456 that atftpd is missing 
a dependency, tcpd.  This is the sole thing corrected with the NMU
upload prepared.

[ Impact ]
atftpd and atftp will be missing in bullseye.  Upstream has become more
active in recent years and it makes sense to keep the package available.

[ Tests ]
I checked manually that the dependency is available after installation
and general functionality.  

[ Risks ]
The changes are trivial, but on the other hand alternatives like
tftp-hpa exist. 
However, they do not have all the features available from atftpd.

[ Checklist ]
  [X] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [X] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [X] attach debdiff against the package in testing

[ Other info ]
I am about to help co-maintaining the package. 

unblock atftp/0.7.git20120829-3.3
diff -u atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/changelog atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/changelog
--- atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/changelog
+++ atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/changelog
@@ -1,3 +1,10 @@
+atftp (0.7.git20120829-3.3) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  * Non-maintainer upload.
+  * Add missing dependency tcpd. (Closes: #988456) 
+
+ -- Andreas B. Mundt <andi@debian.org>  Sun, 25 Jul 2021 18:26:09 +0200
+
 atftp (0.7.git20120829-3.2) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * Non-maintainer upload.
diff -u atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/control atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/control
--- atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/control
+++ atftp-0.7.git20120829/debian/control
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
 
 Package: atftpd
 Architecture: any
-Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, update-inetd, lsb-base
+Depends: ${shlibs:Depends}, ${misc:Depends}, update-inetd, lsb-base, tcpd
 Recommends: inet-superserver
 Conflicts: tftpd
 Suggests: logrotate

Reply to: