[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#991138: marked as done (unblock: davmail/5.5.1.3299-5)

Your message dated Sat, 17 Jul 2021 12:43:04 +0200
with message-id <CAM8zJQvsL13FCM8WPZfr9x06yhG3JBqcuPn1oYevsSPfZ6LXUA@mail.gmail.com>
and subject line Re: Bug#991138: unblock: davmail/5.5.1.3299-5
has caused the Debian Bug report #991138,
regarding unblock: davmail/5.5.1.3299-5
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
991138: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=991138
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

Please unblock package davmail.

The updated version fixes RC bug #987601.
It also fixes the init.d script (when systemd is not used).
It also cleanups a Suggests: of a package no longer in the archive.

This is a leaf package with no rdeps.
Changes are in the Suggests: and in the init.d script when systemd is not
in use: risks of regressions are very low.

unblock davmail/5.5.1.3299-5

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 10.10
  APT prefers stable
  APT policy: (500, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)

Kernel: Linux 4.19.0-16-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=fr_FR.utf8, LC_CTYPE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE=fr_FR.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

diff -Nru davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/changelog davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/changelog
--- davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/changelog	2020-10-13 11:09:08.000000000 +0200
+++ davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/changelog	2021-07-07 14:39:48.000000000 +0200
@@ -1,3 +1,14 @@
+davmail (5.5.1.3299-5) unstable; urgency=medium
+
+  [ Alexandre Rossi ]
+  * drop Suggests of libswt-gtk2-4-jni which is gone from the archive
+  * add default-jre as a Suggests (Closes: #987601)
+
+  [ Meeuwissen Olaf ]
+  * fix conf ignored when starting via init.d script (Closes: #989817)
+
+ -- Alexandre Rossi <alexandre.rossi@gmail.com>  Wed, 07 Jul 2021 14:39:48 +0200
+
 davmail (5.5.1.3299-4) unstable; urgency=medium
 
   * fix service start when not using keystoreFile (Closes: #972136)
diff -Nru davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/control davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/control
--- davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/control	2020-05-03 16:54:47.000000000 +0200
+++ davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/control	2021-07-07 14:29:00.000000000 +0200
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
          ${shlibs:Depends},
          ${misc:Depends},
          ${java:Depends}
-Suggests: libswt-gtk2-4-jni,
+Suggests: default-jre,
           libswt-cairo-gtk-4-jni,
           libopenjfx-java,
 Description: POP/IMAP/SMTP/CalDav/LDAP to Microsoft Exchange gateway
diff -Nru davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/init davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/init
--- davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/init	2018-12-27 17:54:26.000000000 +0100
+++ davmail-5.5.1.3299/debian/init	2021-07-07 14:39:39.000000000 +0200
@@ -19,23 +19,23 @@
 DESC="Davmail Exchange gateway"
 NAME=davmail
 DAEMON=/usr/bin/$NAME
-DAEMON_USER=$NAME
+DAEMON_USER=_$NAME
 HOME=/var/lib/$DAEMON_USER
 PIDFILE=/var/run/$NAME.pid
-LOGFILE=/var/log/$NAME.log
+LOGFILE=/var/log/$NAME/$NAME.log
 SCRIPTNAME=/etc/init.d/$NAME
 
 
 # Exit if the package is not installed
 [ -x "$DAEMON" ] || exit 0
 
-DAEMON_ARGS="/etc/davmail.properties"
+DAEMON_ARGS="-server /etc/davmail/davmail.properties"
 
 # Create logfiles if they do not exist
 if [ ! -r "$LOGFILE" ]
 then
     touch $LOGFILE
-    chown $NAME:adm $LOGFILE
+    chown $DAEMON_USER:adm $LOGFILE
 fi
 
 # Load the VERBOSE setting and other rcS variables

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Unblocked.

--- End Message ---
Reply to: