Your message dated Mon, 12 Jul 2021 23:19:44 +0200 with message-id <YOyx8JmtgZnu6qkA@ramacher.at> and subject line Re: Bug#990991: nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 has caused the Debian Bug report #990991, regarding nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 to be marked as done. This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 990991: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=990991 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
- Subject: nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3
- From: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 14:57:08 +0200
- Message-id: <[🔎] 162609462816.27599.14793879489234452164.reportbug@zam504.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
Package: release.debian.org Severity: normal User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org Usertags: binnmu nmu atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment." The maintainer-uploaded amd64 binaries have dependencies on packages in experimental. libatlas-ecmwf-0 is M-A: same, therefore ANY instead of only amd64. Andreas
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
- To: Andreas Beckmann <anbe@debian.org>, 990991-done@bugs.debian.org
- Subject: Re: Bug#990991: nmu: atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3
- From: Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org>
- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 2021 23:19:44 +0200
- Message-id: <YOyx8JmtgZnu6qkA@ramacher.at>
- In-reply-to: <[🔎] 162609462816.27599.14793879489234452164.reportbug@zam504.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
- References: <[🔎] 162609462816.27599.14793879489234452164.reportbug@zam504.zam.kfa-juelich.de>
On 2021-07-12 14:57:08 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote: > Package: release.debian.org > Severity: normal > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org > Usertags: binnmu > > nmu atlas-ecmwf_0.25.0-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "Rebuild in a clean sid environment." > > The maintainer-uploaded amd64 binaries have dependencies on packages in > experimental. > libatlas-ecmwf-0 is M-A: same, therefore ANY instead of only amd64. Scheduled. But that't wont make atlas-ecmwf migrate if that's what you're after. Cheers -- Sebastian RamacherAttachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--- End Message ---