[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#989357: marked as done (nmu: ros-rviz_1.14.4+dfsg-3)

Your message dated Tue, 15 Jun 2021 22:04:02 +0200
with message-id <YMkHsiKZBq/Epzs6@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#989357: nmu: ros-rviz_1.14.4+dfsg-3
has caused the Debian Bug report #989357,
regarding nmu: ros-rviz_1.14.4+dfsg-3
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
989357: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989357
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: binnmu

Hi release team,

libogre-1.12 bumped it's soname and library names without changing the package
name, breaking rviz (#989344). As rviz is the only dependency, would you be ok
with a binNMU, let it into bullseye and ignore the bug for bullseye?

nmu ros-rviz_1.14.4+dfsg-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against new libogre-1.12 soname"

Thanks!

Jochen

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
On 2021-06-14 21:44:21 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> * Sebastian Ramacher <sramacher@debian.org> [2021-06-12 15:59]:
> > Control: block -1 by 989344
> > 
> > On 2021-06-01 20:56:36 +0200, Jochen Sprickerhof wrote:
> > > Package: release.debian.org
> > > Severity: normal
> > > User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> > > Usertags: binnmu
> > > 
> > > Hi release team,
> > > 
> > > libogre-1.12 bumped it's soname and library names without changing the package
> > > name, breaking rviz (#989344). As rviz is the only dependency, would you be ok
> > > with a binNMU, let it into bullseye and ignore the bug for bullseye?
> > > 
> > > nmu ros-rviz_1.14.4+dfsg-3 . ANY . unstable . -m "rebuild against new libogre-1.12 soname"
> > 
> > Please get libogre fixed first. Marking as blocked by #989344.
> 
> I've just uploaded ogre-1.12_1.12.10+dfsg2-1.2 as source only, fixing
> #989344. Could you take care of the rebuild/unblock or do you want extra
> bugs for that?

Rebuilds were scheduled and an unblock bug has been filed. So let's
close this one. Thanks!

Cheers

> 
> Cheers Jochen



-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: