[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#989597: release.debian.org: upgrade issue: non-coinstallability of libgdal20 and libgdal28



On 6/14/21 9:29 AM, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
> On 13/06/2021 23.44, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>> On 2021-06-13 23:35:40 +0200, Andreas Beckmann wrote:
>>> On 13/06/2021 22.44, Sebastian Ramacher wrote:
>>>> My goal is to make libgdal20 and libgdal28 co-installable. Adding those
>>>> Breaks is not enough and is step into the wrong direction.
>>>
>>> Thanks for making that clear. I'll think again about libogdi ...
>>
>> libogdi4.1 was partially fixed. It only needs the Breaks+Replaces
>> removed. See 989795
> 
> I did some quick tests with the B+R removed, hdf5 patched to build the
> transitional packages and gdal patched to produce gdal3-data: we have
> finally achieved libgdal20/libgdal28 co-installability ;-)

That's nice, but I don't want to maintain a version specific gdal-data
package.

postgis by itself is not interesting, its only contains commandline
tools. postgresql-11-postgis-2.5 is the package which contains the
postgresql extension. That (also) get removed during the `apt upgrade`
from buster to bullseye.

I don't particularly care about having libgdal20 & libgdal28
co-installable for postgis datavase upgrades with pg_upgradecluster.
That has never been supported.

What actual problems do are solved by making them co-installable?

So far the only actualy problem that has been identified is the need for
`apt full-upgrade` twice when the Breaks/Replaces on libgdal20 is not
present.

Kind Regards,

Bas

-- 
 GPG Key ID: 4096R/6750F10AE88D4AF1
Fingerprint: 8182 DE41 7056 408D 6146  50D1 6750 F10A E88D 4AF1


Reply to: