[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

d-e-install: drop powerpc recipes



package: debian-edu-install
x-debbugs-cc: debian-edu@lists.debian.org
version: 1.916

On Sat, Jun 05, 2021 at 12:59:51AM +0200, Holger Levsen wrote:
>  debian-edu-install (2.11.13) unstable; urgency=medium
[...]
> [auto-generated below]
[...]
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac_newworld/90edumain       |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac_newworld/91edumain+ltsp  |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac_newworld/92edumain+ws    |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac_newworld/94edultsp       |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac_newworld/96eduwork       |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac_newworld/97minimal       |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-powermac_newworld/98edustandalone |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-prep/90edumain                    |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-prep/91edumain+ltsp               |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-prep/92edumain+ws                 |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-prep/94edultsp                    |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-prep/96eduwork                    |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-prep/97minimal                    |   15 -
>  lib/partman/recipes-powerpc-prep/98edustandalone              |   15 -

wait, what? why do we still have powerpc recipes in Debian Edu? We dropped
powerpc support some time ago :)

(not fully sure we want this change for bullseye but then I also don't see
how it could hurt to drop those properly.)

(and in any case this shouldn't be a blocker for #989483, the current
d-e-install unblock request...)


-- 
cheers,
	Holger

 ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀
 ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁  holger@(debian|reproducible-builds|layer-acht).org
 ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀  OpenPGP: B8BF54137B09D35CF026FE9D 091AB856069AAA1C
 ⠈⠳⣄

Stop saying that we are all in the same boat.
We’re all in the same storm.
But we’re not all in the same boat.

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: