[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#989418: marked as done (unblock: libpappsomspp/0.8.25-2)

Your message dated Thu, 3 Jun 2021 12:42:06 +0200
with message-id <YLix/lh3XeRIEZxZ@ramacher.at>
and subject line Re: Bug#989418: unblock: libpappsomspp/0.8.25-2
has caused the Debian Bug report #989418,
regarding unblock: libpappsomspp/0.8.25-2
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact owner@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)


-- 
989418: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989418
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact owner@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message --- 
Package: release.debian.org
Severity: normal
User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
Usertags: unblock

unblock libpappsomspp/0.8.25-2

Please unblock package libpappsomspp

Greetings, Fellow Developers,

I would like in this mail to advocate the unblocking of the transition for two
packages:

- libpappsomspp
- minexpert2

minexpert2 depends on libpappsomspp.

[ Reason ]

The libpappsomspp and minexpert2 software packages are developed in my
laboratory and are in daily use since a large number of weeks. The last versions
in unstable (libpappsomspp: 0.8.25-2, minexpert2: 8.1.1-1) work flawlessly in
our hands.


Would you mind to unblock their migration to testing ?

[ Impact ]
It would be very sad if these last versions failed to enter the next stable
release because a number of labs rely on that software piece, in particular
because they use Ubuntu.

[ Risks ]
As mentioned above, the software at hand is stable.

[ Checklist ]
  [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
  [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
  [ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing

In the sincere hope you will agree to this request,

most sincerely,

Filippo


-- 

⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Filippo Rusconi, PhD
⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   Research scientist at CNRS
⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   Debian Developer
⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://msxpertsuite.org
          http://www.debian.org

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message --- 
Hi Filippo

On 2021-06-03 11:58:42 +0200, Filippo Rusconi wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> unblock libpappsomspp/0.8.25-2
> 
> Please unblock package libpappsomspp
> 
> Greetings, Fellow Developers,
> 
> I would like in this mail to advocate the unblocking of the transition for two
> packages:
> 
> - libpappsomspp
> - minexpert2
> 
> minexpert2 depends on libpappsomspp.
> 
> [ Reason ]
> 
> The libpappsomspp and minexpert2 software packages are developed in my
> laboratory and are in daily use since a large number of weeks. The last versions
> in unstable (libpappsomspp: 0.8.25-2, minexpert2: 8.1.1-1) work flawlessly in
> our hands.
> 
> 
> Would you mind to unblock their migration to testing ?

I'm afraid that those two packages do not comply with the freeze policy.

libpappsomspp:  158 files changed, 16635 insertions(+), 5915 deletions(-)
minexpert2:  201 files changed, 16247 insertions(+), 18255 deletions(-)

Those changes do not look like targetted fixes (see
https://release.debian.org/bullseye/FAQ.html on new upstream release).

Also, libpappsomspp broke its ABI and requires a SONAME bump:

$ ldd -r /usr/bin/minexpert2  | grep undefined
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget20replotWithAxesRangesE8QCPRangeS1_NS_8PlotAxisE    (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget27drawRectangleAndPrepareZoomEv     (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget27prepareXDeltaLineAndMeasureEv     (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget24drawXDeltaLineAndMeasureEv        (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget28drawXDeltaLineForIntegrationEv    (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget43calculateDragDeltasAndUnSortedRegionCornersEv     (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget26isProperSelectionRectangleEv      (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso14BasePlotWidget19updateContextRangesEv     (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZNK6pappso20MassSpectrumCombiner7combineERNS_8MapTraceERKNS_5TraceE  (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso18ColorMapPlotConfigC1ENS_8DataKindES1_NS_9AxisScaleES2_S2_mmdddd   (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZNK6pappso20MassSpectrumCombiner7combineERNS_8MapTraceERKS1_ (/usr/bin/minexpert2)
undefined symbol: _ZN6pappso25MassDataCombinerInterface27setFilterResampleKeepXRangeERKNS_24FilterResampleKeepXRangeE   (/usr/bin/minexpert2)

minexpert2 from bullseye has unresolved symbols if libpappsomspp from
unstable is installed.

> [ Impact ]
> It would be very sad if these last versions failed to enter the next stable
> release because a number of labs rely on that software piece, in particular
> because they use Ubuntu.

This is the wrong place for requests regarding Ubuntu. In any case, the
next release of Ubuntu will have minexpert2 8.1.1. 

Cheers

> 
> [ Risks ]
> As mentioned above, the software at hand is stable.
> 
> [ Checklist ]
>   [x] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
>   [x] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>   [ ] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> 
> In the sincere hope you will agree to this request,
> 
> most sincerely,
> 
> Filippo
> 
> 
> -- 
> 
> ⢀⣴⠾⠻⢶⣦⠀  Filippo Rusconi, PhD
> ⣾⠁⢠⠒⠀⣿⡁   Research scientist at CNRS
> ⢿⡄⠘⠷⠚⠋⠀   Debian Developer
> ⠈⠳⣄⠀⠀⠀⠀  http://msxpertsuite.org
>           http://www.debian.org
> 

-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


--- End Message ---
Reply to: