Control: tags -1 moreinfo Hi, On 17-05-2021 02:12, Ben Hutchings wrote: > Please unblock package broadcom-sta > > [ Reason ] > Fix the unusable broadcom-sta-source package. > > [ Impact ] > It is not possible to build a package using module-assistant and the > version of broadcom-sta-source in bullseye. However, dkms and > broadcom-sta-dkms can be used as an alternative. > > [ Tests ] > Only the build processes are being changed. I tested that: > - broadcom-sta can be built from source > - module-assistant can build a module package from broadcom-sta-source > for the current kernel version in bullseye (5.10.0-6-amd64) > - the resulting binary module package looks like a module package > built from broadcom-sta-source in buster, modulo version changes * I wonder, broadcom-sta has seen quite some uploads the last couple of years and debhelper is even in oldstable newer than the version mentioned. How were all these uploads possible? * What is/was the behavior of debhelper if the compat level was not specified? In the freeze we don't want debhelper compat bumps unless the package is proven to have no delta regardless of the old-vs-new level. Paul
Attachment:
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature