[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#989006: unblock: vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3



Control: tags -1 moreinfo

On 2021-05-23 09:45:15 +0200, Étienne Mollier wrote:
> Package: release.debian.org
> Severity: normal
> User: release.debian.org@packages.debian.org
> Usertags: unblock
> 
> Good day,
> 
> Please unblock package vtk-dicom
> 
> [ Reason ]
> The version in unstable addresses RC bugs #988643 and #988745
> affecting vtk-dicom in bullseye.
> 
> [ Impact ]
> If the situation is left as is, then:
>   * users of python3-vtk-dicom will see a dangling link in
>     dist-packages/, and think this is a broken Python module;
>   * users willing to check the integrity of the package through
>     autopkgtest will see test failures due to improper module
>     being called by autodep8-python3.
> 
> [ Tests ]
> Tests I carried on are:
>   * the usual package building and autopkgtest on amd64;
>   * piuparts --fail-on-broken-symlinks to make sure #988643 is
>     resolved;
>   * running a test script I found in the source code, in the
>     file Testing/TestDICOMPython.py, a wee bit less superficial
>     than the autodep8 import.
> 
> [ Risks ]
> Almost zero risk of regression, only a dangling link is removed,
> and the test suite is adjusted.
> 
> [ Checklist ]
>   [*] all changes are documented in the d/changelog
>   [*] I reviewed all changes and I approve them
>   [*] attach debdiff against the package in testing
> 
> unblock vtk-dicom/0.8.12-3
> 
> Have a nice day,  :)
> -- 
> Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org>
> Fingerprint:  8f91 b227 c7d6 f2b1 948c  8236 793c f67e 8f0d 11da
> Sent from /dev/pts/3, please excuse my verbosity.

> diff -Nru vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/changelog vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/changelog
> --- vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/changelog	2019-12-22 14:42:19.000000000 +0100
> +++ vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/changelog	2021-05-22 15:08:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,3 +1,19 @@
> +vtk-dicom (0.8.12-3) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Team upload.
> +  * d/{python3-vtk-dicom,not-installed}: do not install libvtkDICOMPython*.so
> +    Closes: #988643
> +
> + -- Étienne Mollier <etienne.mollier@mailoo.org>  Sat, 22 May 2021 15:08:12 +0200
> +
> +vtk-dicom (0.8.12-2) unstable; urgency=medium
> +
> +  * Team upload.
> +  * Fix autopkgtest.  Thanks for the patch to Étienne Mollier.
> +    Closes: #988745

Something seems to be wrong with the autopkgtests. They are not run.
Could you please check what's wrong there? Once fixed, vtk-dicom will be
able to migrate without an unblock.

Cheers

> +
> + -- Andreas Tille <tille@debian.org>  Wed, 19 May 2021 15:30:05 +0200
> +
>  vtk-dicom (0.8.12-1) unstable; urgency=medium
>  
>    * New upstream version 0.8.12
> diff -Nru vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/not-installed vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/not-installed
> --- vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/not-installed	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/not-installed	2021-05-22 15:08:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1,2 @@
> +# Linker name of Python module primitives probably not needed.  See #988643.
> +usr/lib/*/libvtkDICOMPython*.so
> diff -Nru vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/python3-vtk-dicom.install vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/python3-vtk-dicom.install
> --- vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/python3-vtk-dicom.install	2019-12-22 14:42:19.000000000 +0100
> +++ vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/python3-vtk-dicom.install	2021-05-22 15:08:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -1,5 +1,4 @@
>  #!/usr/bin/dh-exec 
>  usr/lib/*/libvtkDICOMPython*.so.* 
> -usr/lib/*/libvtkDICOMPython*.so usr/lib/python${PYVER}/dist-packages
>  usr/lib/*/vtkDICOMPython*.so usr/lib/python${PYVER}/dist-packages
>  
> diff -Nru vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-python.conf vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-python.conf
> --- vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-python.conf	1970-01-01 01:00:00.000000000 +0100
> +++ vtk-dicom-0.8.12/debian/tests/autopkgtest-pkg-python.conf	2021-05-22 15:08:12.000000000 +0200
> @@ -0,0 +1 @@
> +import_name = vtkDICOMPython




-- 
Sebastian Ramacher

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: PGP signature


Reply to: